General practice legal-AI skills in Cross-jurisdiction

39 legal AI skills for general practice in Cross-jurisdiction.

Alternative Fee Arrangement Template

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when drafting an alternative fee arrangement (AFA) proposal or agreement between a law firm and a client, covering fixed fee, capped fee, success fee, blended rate, and subscription/retainer structures. Legal ops and billing practice area. Note: success/conditional fees are prohibited in certain MENA jurisdictions — this skill flags those restrictions.

Citation Conventions — MENA Jurisdictions

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when citing primary legal sources from MENA jurisdictions — UAE federal decrees, KSA Royal Decrees, Lebanese laws, Egyptian laws, and instruments from the DIFC, ADGM, and QFC — in a jurisdiction-appropriate format. Provides the canonical citation template for each jurisdiction, covering both onshore civil-law and offshore common-law frameworks across the Gulf and Levant.

Citation Format — French Civil Law (Dalloz / JurisClasseur)

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when formatting legal citations in the French civil-law style (Dalloz / JurisClasseur convention) for case law, statutes, and doctrine. Applies to outputs destined for francophone MENA jurisdictions (Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia) as well as France — where citation style follows Cass. com./Civ./soc. conventions rather than Bluebook or OSCOLA.

Client Intake Form

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a law firm or in-house legal department needs to create or customise a client intake form for new matters. Captures client identity, matter description, conflict check data, document collection needs, urgency assessment, and initial budget estimate. Applicable across all practice areas and jurisdictions; includes MENA-specific KYC and beneficial ownership fields required under UAE, KSA, and Lebanese AML regulations.

Common-Law-Qualitätstor

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Fertig erstelltes Common-Law-Arbeitsprodukt auf Qualitaet prüfen: Jurisdiktion Quellenstand False Friends UK/US-Trennung Review-Bedarf. Prüfraster Jurisdiktion-Konsistenz Normen-Aktualitaet False-Friends-Scan UK-US-Trennung. Output Qualitaets-Prüfbericht Lueckenliste. Abgrenzung zu common-law-false-friends-scanner (Begriffe) und common-law-bilingual-contract-review (Vergleich).

Comparative Analyst

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Compares how a specific legal question is treated across specified jurisdictions or statutes, sourcing each jurisdiction's position only from current authoritative text retrieved this session or supplied by the user — an incomplete comparison with a gap stated plainly is always preferred over a complete-looking one filled from memory. Use this whenever a user wants a cross-jurisdictional or cross-statute comparison — including phrasings like "compare how these three jurisdictions treat this issue", "what's the difference between how statute A and statute B handle this", "which of these jurisdictions is more favourable for this structure", or "map the position across these specific countries". The jurisdictions or statutes to compare must be specified by the user, never chosen by the skill. Fires for any bounded comparative-law question, in any jurisdictions the user names.

Framework

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Analyze legal documents (statutes, contracts, constitutions, treaties, and regulatory texts) using a cross-jurisdictional framework of legal interpretation.

Inst — Legal Aid Routing

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a user cannot afford a lawyer or explicitly asks about free legal help, pro bono services, or legal aid programs across MENA jurisdictions (KSA, UAE, LB, EG) and international organizations (UNHCR, NGOs). Routes consumers and vulnerable individuals to the appropriate government legal aid scheme, bar association clinic, court-appointed counsel program, or specialized aid organization based on geography, legal issue type, and vulnerability profile. P1 access-to-justice function; activates when income or vulnerability flags are present.

Inst — MENA Notary Integration

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a matter requires notarization, authentication, or apostille of a legal document across MENA jurisdictions (LB, KSA, UAE, EG). Covers Lebanese Notaires Publics, Saudi MOJ notary services, UAE federal and emirate-level notaries, Egyptian notarization offices, cross-border Tawqi3i e-notarization, and Hague Apostille procedures. Surfaces notary requirements for specific document types, helps practitioners identify the correct notarial authority, and generates pre-notarization checklists.

Intel — Access to Justice Gap

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when responding to questions about the access-to-justice gap, the global and MENA-specific unmet legal need landscape, the case for consumer legal AI, or mission-alignment arguments for free/subsidized legal assistance tools. Covers headline statistics (92% unmet global; 80-95% in MENA), issue types, structural causes, existing solutions and their limits, bar-rule constraints on unauthorized practice, and the bull case for AI-powered legal orientation at scale. P0 foundational intelligence for product positioning and A2J-mission conversations.

Intel — Global Legal Market Size

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when answering questions about the size of the global legal services market, key revenue figures, average billing rates, the access-to-justice gap scale, or strategic context for the legal AI opportunity. Covers the ~$1.08 trillion global market, segment breakdown (BigLaw, mid-tier, in-house, ALSP, legal AI), MENA specific sizing, and key drivers of market dynamics. P1 reference intelligence for investor discussions, strategy documents, and competitive positioning.

Jurisdiction Comparison

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a user needs to compare how a specific legal issue is handled across multiple jurisdictions — to choose where to incorporate, where to arbitrate, which governing law to select, or to understand cross-border deal risk. Produces a structured comparison table with per-jurisdiction columns covering statute, rule, enforceability, duration limits, and risk; concludes with a recommendation. Covers MENA (LB, KSA, UAE onshore, DIFC, ADGM, EG) and secondary jurisdictions (UK, US-DE, FR, EU). Each cell must cite a real source.

Jurisdiction Research

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

[JURISDICTION] Investiga el marco legal de una jurisdiccion contra fuentes oficiales y llena knowledge-legal con norma, obligacion, fuente y fecha. Usar despues de jurisdiction-setup, o cuando el archivo de una jurisdiccion este vencido.

Jurisdiction Setup

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

[JURISDICTION] Configura el perfil legal preguntando pais, departamento, municipio, sector y arquitectura de negocio, y crea los archivos base que cargaran los demas skills. Usar una sola vez al instalar el kit, o al empezar a operar en un territorio o sector nuevo.

Justice — Human Handoff

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when Louis determines that a user's legal matter exceeds AI-only assistance and requires human professional intervention — a lawyer, specialist advisor, emergency service, or regulated professional. Covers the full set of handoff triggers (criminal risk, emergency, high penalty exposure, multi-jurisdictional litigation, user distress, explicit request, low confidence), the handoff process (acknowledge, identify domain, provide resource, schedule), and the constraint that Louis must never pretend to be a human, lawyer, or therapist. P0 safety-critical behavior.

Justice Intent — Legal Research

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when the public-facing assistant detects that a user wants to conduct legal research — asking about the law on a topic, requesting a case summary, seeking statute interpretation, or asking what the rules are in a specific jurisdiction. Routes to the appropriate research skill or capability and frames the accessibility-oriented response for users who may be self-represented. Covers all MENA and secondary jurisdictions.

Justinian — Course Outline Builder

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a law student needs a comprehensive course outline for exam preparation, bar revision, or self-study. Produces a structured topic hierarchy with black-letter rules, leading cases (1–3 per topic), common exam patterns, issue interactions, and memorization aids (mnemonics, comparison charts). Calibrated to specific law-school courses (Contracts, Torts, Civ Pro, Con Law, Crim Law, Evidence, Property, Corporate, and more) and to the applicable jurisdiction. Particularly strong for MENA civil-law courses (Lebanon, UAE, KSA, Egypt) and common-law courses (DIFC, UK, US).

Justinian — Curriculum Builder

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a user wants a personalized legal-education curriculum — a structured, week-by-week study plan calibrated to their level (1L through bar candidate), target jurisdiction, practice area interests, specific weaknesses, and available time. Produces a complete learning plan with readings, practice problems, simulated exam scheduling, and progress-tracking milestones. Covers all MENA and secondary jurisdictions; P0 priority.

Justinian — Exam Time Management Coach

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a student or bar candidate needs specific guidance on pacing, time allocation, and exam strategy for timed legal examinations — MBE, MEE, MPT, CRFPA note de synthèse, KSA bar, UAE bar, SQE1/SQE2, or Lebanese concours. Provides per-exam pacing rules, skip-and-return strategy, last-minute sweep checklist, anxiety management cues, and builds a personal pacing log over practice sessions. Covers all exam jurisdictions.

Justinian — Flashcards from Statute

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a user wants to generate spaced-repetition flashcards from a statute, legal code, or regulation for bar exam or legal education purposes. Produces four card formats — term/definition, article/content, fact-pattern/rule, and comparison — plus a spaced-repetition schedule. Supports export to Anki, CSV, and in-app review. Covers all jurisdictions; most heavily used for MENA statutes (UAE Labor Law, KSA Companies Law, KSA PDPL, Lebanese COC).

Justinian — IRAC Coach

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a law student or bar candidate needs structured coaching on IRAC-method legal analysis. This skill guides the learner issue-by-issue through Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion, identifies common errors in real time, applies a 0–5 rubric, and supports bar-exam-style multi-issue timed practice. Suitable for any jurisdiction; MENA fact patterns (UAE, KSA, Lebanon, Egypt) handled with equal depth.

Justinian — Law School Case Brief Summarizer

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a law student or practitioner needs a structured case brief for any court decision. Produces a standard law-school brief covering procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, rule, reasoning, concurrences/dissents, and subsequent treatment. Adapts depth to the reader's level (1L, 2L/3L, bar prep, or practitioner). Multi-jurisdictional; particularly useful for common-law cases from DIFC, ADGM, UK, and US courts, and civil-law decisions from Lebanese, UAE, KSA, Egyptian, or French courts.

Justinian — Legal Essay Grader

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a student submits a written legal essay, exam answer, or practice response for automated grading. Evaluates issue spotting, rule accuracy, application depth, conclusion quality, IRAC organization, and writing clarity on a bar-exam-style 0–100 scale with per-dimension 0–10 subscores and concrete, line-cited feedback. Adapts standard to student level (1L through bar candidate). Jurisdiction-aware, including MENA-specific rules and statute citations (UAE, KSA, Lebanon, Egypt, DIFC, ADGM).

Justinian — Moot Court Rehearsal

MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice

Use when a student or junior lawyer is preparing for moot court, appellate oral argument, or any structured advocacy performance. This skill simulates the judicial bench (hot, cold, or hostile), coaches the opening roadmap, critiques argument structure and citation accuracy in real time, tracks time, and prepares rebuttal. Jurisdiction-agnostic; adapts to common-law (DIFC, ADGM, UK, US) and civil-law (Lebanon, UAE onshore, KSA, Egypt) court styles.