Regulatory legal-AI skills in Cross-jurisdiction

44 legal AI skills for regulatory in Cross-jurisdiction.

Accessibility Compliance Specialist IA

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Accessibility Compliance Specialist IA — Expert en conformité accessibilité (ADA, Section 508, RGAA, EN 301 549, WCAG legal)

AI Act and Regulatory Compliance Doc Skill

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Use when classifying AI features against applicable regulatory regimes and mapping obligations, evidence, owners, gaps, and release conditions. Use regulator-overlap-mapping for multi-regime evidence reuse and responsible-ai-declaration for product disclosure.

AI Agent Regulator Overlap Mapping Skill

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Use when crosswalking AI-agent controls and evidence across two or more regulatory or assurance regimes while exposing divergent obligations. Use each regime's control pack for authoritative detail and evidence-pack-spec for handling requirements.

Anti-Satellite-Test-Ban und Orbital-Debris-Pledge

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Für Anti-Satellite-Test-Ban und Orbital-Debris-Pledge: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Bar Rule 5.5 — Unauthorized Practice of Law and AI

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Use when assessing whether AI-generated legal output may constitute unauthorized practice of law (UPL) in a given jurisdiction, or when configuring the appropriate output mode (consumer-informational vs. lawyer-supervised) for a given user. Covers ABA Model Rule 5.5 and its analogs in US states, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, UAE (onshore and DIFC/ADGM), UK, and France. Defines the line between permissible legal information and impermissible legal advice, and the acts AI must never perform (court appearance, pleading filing, client representation).

CCPA/CPRA — California Consumer Privacy Act & Privacy Rights Act

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Usa este skill cuando desarrolles software que recolecte, almacene o procese información personal de usuarios. Aunque CCPA/CPRA es legislación de California, este skill se aplica como estándar de privacidad para cualquier software independientemente de la ubicación geográfica de los usuarios. Cubre derechos del consumidor (know, delete, correct, portability, opt-out), modelo de datos, opt-out DNSS con GPC, notice at collection, menores de edad, y checklist de cumplimiento.

Clause

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Reviewing legal documents for Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Tokushoho compliance. Detects clause gaps and flags risks. Not a substitute for legal advice — consult a lawyer.

Commercial LEO Destinations - ISS-Nachfolge

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Für Commercial LEO Destinations - ISS-Nachfolge: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Compliance Check

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Regulatory and legal compliance audit. Discovers which frameworks apply based on jurisdiction, industry, and data types, then checks the codebase against the applicable controls. EU-first (GDPR, NIS2, EU AI Act, DORA) with support for UK, US federal and state laws, sector-specific regimes (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001), and emerging AI regulation. Use when the user asks about GDPR, compliance, regulation, data protection law, audit readiness, invokes /compliance-check, or when the orchestrator delegates. Mode-aware and scope-tier-aware.

Compliance Mapping Specialist

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Maps accessibility audit results to legal/regulatory frameworks — Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, AODA. Generates VPAT 2.5 conformance tables and identifies non-WCAG requirements.

Compliance Mapping Specialist

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Map findings to Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, AODA; build a VPAT.

Compliance OS — Meta-Orchestrator

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Compliance OS — meta-orchestrator that lets compliance teams CONFIGURE which frameworks apply, COMPUTE cross-framework control overlap, SIMULATE internal audits, and CONSOLIDATE evidence across multiple frameworks. Four decisions: (1) Given a company profile, which of the 12 supported frameworks apply (ISO 27001/13485/42001/14971, EU AI Act, MDR 745, GDPR, SOC 2, FDA QSR, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, HIPAA)? (2) Across selected frameworks, which controls overlap and how much evidence reuses? (3) For a given framework + scope, what does a realistic mock audit produce — drawing from the 205-scenario library? (4) Across selected frameworks, what's the unified evidence checklist with reuse map? Use when standing up a multi-framework program, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1. Does NOT replace per-framework skills (it orchestrates them).

Core competencies

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Auto-detect EU AI Act Annex III categories and US-state high-risk equivalents for any described AI system

Cultural Heritage Protection Legal Summary

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Generates structured legal briefings on cultural heritage protection developments. Synthesizes judicial decisions, legislation, treaty updates, and regulatory changes across repatriation, trafficking, armed conflict, underwater heritage, intangible cultural heritage, and indigenous rights. Trigger when producing periodic briefings, policy digests, or thematic research for governments, NGOs, cultural institutions, or international organizations working in cultural property law.

Cultural Heritage Protection Summary

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Produces structured, citation-ready summaries of legal developments in cultural heritage protection covering repatriation, site protection, illicit trafficking, and treaty updates. Use when tracking heritage law, preparing government or NGO briefings, or summarizing international and national decisions. Trigger keywords include cultural heritage, repatriation, restitution, UNESCO 1970, Hague Convention 1954, UNIDROIT 1995, illicit trafficking, underwater heritage, and intangible heritage.

Deploy AI Compliance Engine

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Deploy AI Compliance Engine — configure regulatory check framework (GDPR, HIPAA, EU AI Act, SOC 2), automated audit trail, risk scoring, evidence collection. Use when: deploy, configure compliance.

E-sign compliance — UETA / ESIGN / eIDAS / eIDAS 2.0

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

E-signature compliance — UETA (US state), ESIGN Act (US federal), eIDAS Regulation 910/2014 + eIDAS 2.0 / EUDI Wallet (EU), UK Electronic Communications Act, plus industry overlays (21 CFR Part 11 FDA, HIPAA, CMMC, FedRAMP). Pick signature tier (SES / AES / QES); produce per-jurisdiction compliance checklist; recommend Trust List provider for QES. Use when the user says "is this signature legally binding?", "eIDAS QES", "UETA / ESIGN compliance", "21 CFR Part 11 e-signature", "HIPAA-compliant e-sign", "RON statute".

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Current AI regulatory landscape — EU AI Act, FINRA, FDA, US state AI laws — and client-system exposure mapping

Europarechtskonformität

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Für Europarechtskonformität: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Schnittstellenkarte mit Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen. Fachgebiet: Legistik-Werkstatt. Route: europarechtskonformitaet.

Juristischer Argumentationskern - Weltraumrecht

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Schaltet sich ein, wenn in Weltraumrecht ein juristisches Arbeitsprodukt tragfähig begründet werden muss; verbindet konkrete Aktenfundstellen mit Tatbestandsmerkmal, Beweislast, stärkster Gegenposition und Rechtsfolge.

Legal-Information-Not-Advice — Rule Set

MITCross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Use to govern when, where, and how the legal-information-not-legal-advice disclaimer must appear. Defines the precise line between permissible legal information and regulated legal advice, specifies which surface types require inline disclaimers vs. page-level disclaimers vs. no disclaimer (lawyer/eFirm surfaces), and provides ready-to-use disclaimer language for consumer chat, public tools, and drafted documents. Core safety rail for all consumer-facing and public-tool output.

Lunar Heritage und Schutz historischer Mondlandestellen

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Für Lunar Heritage und Schutz historischer Mondlandestellen: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Quantenkommunikation via Satellit

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Für Quantenkommunikation via Satellit: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Reg gap analysis

Apache-2.0Cross-jurisdictionRegulatory

Diff a new AI regulation or guidance against your current governance posture — surfaces gaps, priorities, and a remediation plan with owners and deadlines. Use when an AI regulation moves (or you learn about one you missed), or when user says "new reg just dropped", "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for EU AI Act", "compliance check against [AI law or guidance]", or pastes regulatory text.