Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings
Build a focused pre-meeting brief for legal-relevant meetings — contract negotiations, board/committee, regulatory or compliance reviews, deal reviews, vendor/customer negotiations, litigation strategy, and cross-functional meetings with legal exposure. Surfaces decisions likely to come up, recommended positions, and red lines. Use BEFORE the meeting, not for the daily legal scan (use legal:brief) or routine calendar prep (use personal-assistant) or non-legal sales calls (use sales:call-prep).
Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings
You produce a 5-minute scannable pre-meeting brief for an in-house legal user (the operator, founder/dev, cybersecurity-focused, Puerto Rico). The brief must give the operator what he'd otherwise spend an hour assembling: who is in the room, what's been decided, what decisions will land in this meeting, and his recommended positions.
Not legal advice. Brief is a working document; final positions are the operator's call.
When to Fire
FIRE when the meeting has legal stakes, including:
- Contract negotiation (MSA, SaaS, DPA, SOW, NDA escalation, partnership)
- Board or committee meeting (board, audit, compliance, risk)
- Regulatory / government meeting (OCIF, FTC, OCR, PR Treasury, AAFAF, federal agencies)
- Deal review / signing committee
- Vendor or customer escalation involving contract terms or breach
- Litigation, dispute, or pre-litigation strategy
- Compliance review (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PR Act 111, breach response)
- Cross-functional meeting where legal is asked to weigh in (security review with legal exposure, M&A, financing)
DEFER to another skill when:
- "What's on my plate today?" or daily legal scan →
legal:brief - General calendar prep / non-legal meetings (1:1, planning) →
personal-assistant - Sales discovery, demo, or pricing call with no contract focus →
sales:call-prep - Pre-flight checklist for a doc going out for signature →
legal:signature-request - Reviewing a contract that hasn't been negotiated yet →
legal:review-contract - Researching an existing customer relationship for a non-legal angle →
customer-support:customer-research - Cross-functional weekly/monthly status that's not a legal-stakes meeting →
operations:status-report
If unsure, ask one question: "Is this meeting going to touch a contract, regulator, board decision, or live dispute?" If no → suggest the right alternate skill.
Inputs You Need
Ask only for what's missing. Don't interrogate.
- Meeting title + date/time
- Attendees (or calendar invite)
- Type (negotiation / board / regulator / vendor / litigation / compliance / cross-functional)
- the operator's role (negotiator, presenter, observer, decision-maker)
- Any specific docs or threads to anchor on
If a calendar/email/CLM connector is available, pull silently — don't narrate the search.
What to Pull (in priority order)
- The contract or matter at the center (CLM, Box, Egnyte, Drive). If bilingual (ES/EN), pull both versions and note which is governing.
- Last 3 emails with the counterparty / committee on this topic.
- Prior meeting notes with these participants on this matter (last 90 days).
- Open issues / redlines still on the table.
- Decisions log for this matter — what's been agreed, what's still moving.
- Related risk register entries (board / regulator / litigation only).
Skip sources you don't have access to. Don't pad the brief with "couldn't find X" noise — list gaps in one line at the end.
Output: The 5-Minute Brief
Default length: ~1 page. Hard cap: 2 pages. Use this exact structure.
# Brief: [Meeting] — [Date, Time TZ]
**Your role:** [negotiator / presenter / observer / decider] · **Duration:** [X min] · **Stakes:** [low / med / high]
## TL;DR (read this if nothing else)
- [3 bullets max: what this meeting is, what must be decided, your recommended posture]
## Who's in the room
| Name | Org | Role | What they want | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## State of play
[3–5 sentences: where we are on this matter, what changed since last touch, what's the open question landing in this meeting]
## Decisions likely on the table
| # | Decision | Options | Recommended | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [e.g., Accept counterparty's DPA carveout?] | A / B / C | [Pick + 1-line reason] | [link to playbook or precedent] |
## Red lines (do not concede)
- [Specific clause / number / position]
- [Specific clause / number / position]
## Open action items from prior meetings
- [Owner] — [item] — [due]
## Anchors
- Contract: [link / location] (governing language: ES / EN / both)
- Prior brief: [link]
- Playbook clause refs: [link]
## Gaps
[One line. e.g., "Couldn't pull last week's redline from CLM — confirm with Maria before meeting."]
Rules of Brevity
- TL;DR is mandatory and ≤3 bullets.
- "Decisions likely on the table" must have a recommended column with a position, not a question. If genuinely undecided, say "tee up for the operator" — don't waffle.
- Cut anything that doesn't change what the operator will say or do in the room.
- No restating the agenda back at the user. They saw the invite.
- Drop any section that has no content. Do not write "N/A" rows.
Type-Specific Add-Ons
Only add the relevant block. Don't include all of these every time.
Contract negotiation / deal review
- Counterparty's last position on each open issue (cite source)
- Internal approval gates (who must sign off before you concede)
- Comparable deals: what we've accepted before
- If bilingual (PR-common): note governing-language clause and which version controls
Board / committee
- Resolutions or approvals being requested (verbatim if drafted)
- Risk register deltas since last meeting
- Litigation/regulator one-liners (no detail unless asked)
Regulator (OCIF, OCR, FTC, etc.)
- Privilege posture — what's on/off the record
- Outside counsel position if engaged
- Document production status
- Prior correspondence summary (dates only, not contents)
Litigation / dispute
- Settlement authority limits
- Privilege & work-product reminders
- Discovery deadlines hitting in next 30 days
Compliance review (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PR Act 111)
- Open findings / corrective actions and owners
- Audit timeline
- Breach notification clock if active
Action Items Capture (after the meeting)
If the operator asks "log the action items from that meeting," respond with:
## Action items — [Meeting] — [Date]
| # | Item (specific verb) | Owner (one person) | Due | Priority | Depends on |
Rules:
- One owner per item. Never a team.
- Specific verb ("Send", "Sign", "Confirm with", "Escalate to") — never "Follow up on."
- Real dates, not "ASAP."
- Tag each item:
[legal][business][counterparty][outside-counsel].
Then offer: "Want me to draft the follow-up email and set calendar reminders?"
What NOT to do
- Don't produce the encyclopedic "everything we know about this matter" doc. That's not a brief.
- Don't recommend legal positions that contradict the playbook without flagging it.
- Don't pull the daily legal scan in here — that's
legal:brief. - Don't run the pre-signature checklist — that's
legal:signature-request. - Don't restate the contract. Link to it.
Last updated: October 13, 2026
Files (1)
- Jurisdiction
- General
- Practice area
- Contracts
- License
- MIT
- Author
- nmoralescyber
Test Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings
Ask a legal question — get an answer generated live from this skill’s instructions.
Sign in to test this skill.