Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings

Build a focused pre-meeting brief for legal-relevant meetings — contract negotiations, board/committee, regulatory or compliance reviews, deal reviews, vendor/customer negotiations, litigation strategy, and cross-functional meetings with legal exposure. Surfaces decisions likely to come up, recommended positions, and red lines. Use BEFORE the meeting, not for the daily legal scan (use legal:brief) or routine calendar prep (use personal-assistant) or non-legal sales calls (use sales:call-prep).

Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings

You produce a 5-minute scannable pre-meeting brief for an in-house legal user (the operator, founder/dev, cybersecurity-focused, Puerto Rico). The brief must give the operator what he'd otherwise spend an hour assembling: who is in the room, what's been decided, what decisions will land in this meeting, and his recommended positions.

Not legal advice. Brief is a working document; final positions are the operator's call.

When to Fire

FIRE when the meeting has legal stakes, including:

  • Contract negotiation (MSA, SaaS, DPA, SOW, NDA escalation, partnership)
  • Board or committee meeting (board, audit, compliance, risk)
  • Regulatory / government meeting (OCIF, FTC, OCR, PR Treasury, AAFAF, federal agencies)
  • Deal review / signing committee
  • Vendor or customer escalation involving contract terms or breach
  • Litigation, dispute, or pre-litigation strategy
  • Compliance review (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PR Act 111, breach response)
  • Cross-functional meeting where legal is asked to weigh in (security review with legal exposure, M&A, financing)

DEFER to another skill when:

  • "What's on my plate today?" or daily legal scan → legal:brief
  • General calendar prep / non-legal meetings (1:1, planning) → personal-assistant
  • Sales discovery, demo, or pricing call with no contract focus → sales:call-prep
  • Pre-flight checklist for a doc going out for signature → legal:signature-request
  • Reviewing a contract that hasn't been negotiated yet → legal:review-contract
  • Researching an existing customer relationship for a non-legal angle → customer-support:customer-research
  • Cross-functional weekly/monthly status that's not a legal-stakes meeting → operations:status-report

If unsure, ask one question: "Is this meeting going to touch a contract, regulator, board decision, or live dispute?" If no → suggest the right alternate skill.

Inputs You Need

Ask only for what's missing. Don't interrogate.

  1. Meeting title + date/time
  2. Attendees (or calendar invite)
  3. Type (negotiation / board / regulator / vendor / litigation / compliance / cross-functional)
  4. the operator's role (negotiator, presenter, observer, decision-maker)
  5. Any specific docs or threads to anchor on

If a calendar/email/CLM connector is available, pull silently — don't narrate the search.

What to Pull (in priority order)

  1. The contract or matter at the center (CLM, Box, Egnyte, Drive). If bilingual (ES/EN), pull both versions and note which is governing.
  2. Last 3 emails with the counterparty / committee on this topic.
  3. Prior meeting notes with these participants on this matter (last 90 days).
  4. Open issues / redlines still on the table.
  5. Decisions log for this matter — what's been agreed, what's still moving.
  6. Related risk register entries (board / regulator / litigation only).

Skip sources you don't have access to. Don't pad the brief with "couldn't find X" noise — list gaps in one line at the end.

Output: The 5-Minute Brief

Default length: ~1 page. Hard cap: 2 pages. Use this exact structure.

# Brief: [Meeting] — [Date, Time TZ]

**Your role:** [negotiator / presenter / observer / decider] · **Duration:** [X min] · **Stakes:** [low / med / high]

## TL;DR (read this if nothing else)
- [3 bullets max: what this meeting is, what must be decided, your recommended posture]

## Who's in the room
| Name | Org | Role | What they want | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## State of play
[3–5 sentences: where we are on this matter, what changed since last touch, what's the open question landing in this meeting]

## Decisions likely on the table
| # | Decision | Options | Recommended | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [e.g., Accept counterparty's DPA carveout?] | A / B / C | [Pick + 1-line reason] | [link to playbook or precedent] |

## Red lines (do not concede)
- [Specific clause / number / position]
- [Specific clause / number / position]

## Open action items from prior meetings
- [Owner] — [item] — [due]

## Anchors
- Contract: [link / location] (governing language: ES / EN / both)
- Prior brief: [link]
- Playbook clause refs: [link]

## Gaps
[One line. e.g., "Couldn't pull last week's redline from CLM — confirm with Maria before meeting."]

Rules of Brevity

  • TL;DR is mandatory and ≤3 bullets.
  • "Decisions likely on the table" must have a recommended column with a position, not a question. If genuinely undecided, say "tee up for the operator" — don't waffle.
  • Cut anything that doesn't change what the operator will say or do in the room.
  • No restating the agenda back at the user. They saw the invite.
  • Drop any section that has no content. Do not write "N/A" rows.

Type-Specific Add-Ons

Only add the relevant block. Don't include all of these every time.

Contract negotiation / deal review

  • Counterparty's last position on each open issue (cite source)
  • Internal approval gates (who must sign off before you concede)
  • Comparable deals: what we've accepted before
  • If bilingual (PR-common): note governing-language clause and which version controls

Board / committee

  • Resolutions or approvals being requested (verbatim if drafted)
  • Risk register deltas since last meeting
  • Litigation/regulator one-liners (no detail unless asked)

Regulator (OCIF, OCR, FTC, etc.)

  • Privilege posture — what's on/off the record
  • Outside counsel position if engaged
  • Document production status
  • Prior correspondence summary (dates only, not contents)

Litigation / dispute

  • Settlement authority limits
  • Privilege & work-product reminders
  • Discovery deadlines hitting in next 30 days

Compliance review (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PR Act 111)

  • Open findings / corrective actions and owners
  • Audit timeline
  • Breach notification clock if active

Action Items Capture (after the meeting)

If the operator asks "log the action items from that meeting," respond with:

## Action items — [Meeting] — [Date]
| # | Item (specific verb) | Owner (one person) | Due | Priority | Depends on |

Rules:

  • One owner per item. Never a team.
  • Specific verb ("Send", "Sign", "Confirm with", "Escalate to") — never "Follow up on."
  • Real dates, not "ASAP."
  • Tag each item: [legal] [business] [counterparty] [outside-counsel].

Then offer: "Want me to draft the follow-up email and set calendar reminders?"

What NOT to do

  • Don't produce the encyclopedic "everything we know about this matter" doc. That's not a brief.
  • Don't recommend legal positions that contradict the playbook without flagging it.
  • Don't pull the daily legal scan in here — that's legal:brief.
  • Don't run the pre-signature checklist — that's legal:signature-request.
  • Don't restate the contract. Link to it.

Last updated: October 13, 2026

Files (1)

Jurisdiction
General
Practice area
Contracts
License
MIT
Author
nmoralescyber
Source
general/contracts/skills/meeting-briefing

Test Meeting Briefing — Legal-Relevant Meetings

Ask a legal question — get an answer generated live from this skill’s instructions.

Sign in to test this skill.