Missing-Clauses Detector

Use when a contract needs a completeness check against the standard skeleton for its document type. Identifies absent mandatory, strongly recommended, and optional clauses across NDAs, MSAs, leases, employment agreements, and other common commercial instruments. Flags jurisdiction-specific mandatory provisions and links to drafting skills for remediation. Suitable as a first-pass quality gate before any detailed clause-by-clause review.

Missing-Clauses Detector

When to use this

Use this skill as a first-pass quality gate on any contract:

  • After receiving a first draft from a counterparty — to check what they have omitted
  • Before signing — to confirm the agreement is complete
  • When assessing a historic agreement — to understand its gaps
  • After generating a first draft via a drafting skill — to confirm completeness before sending

This skill identifies structural gaps. It is a completeness check, not a risk-in-existing-clauses review — run [[review-risk-flagging]] alongside it for the full picture.

Process

  1. Identify document type from the subject line, title, recitals, or the user's description (NDA, MSA, lease, employment agreement, SHA, services agreement, etc.)
  2. Load the standard skeleton for that document type — each document type has a minimum viable clause list (see below)
  3. Compare clause by clause: scan for each expected provision; note if absent, partially present, or fully present
  4. Categorize each gap:
    • Mandatory: absence may make the contract invalid, unenforceable, or expose to regulatory penalty
    • Strongly recommended: absence creates material legal risk or ambiguity
    • Optional: standard market practice but not legally required; include if in scope for this deal type

Standard Clause Skeletons by Document Type

NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement)

ClauseCategoryWhy it matters
Parties and recitalsMandatoryDefines who the obligation runs between
Definition of Confidential InformationMandatoryWithout it, the NDA protects nothing
Standard 4 exclusions (public domain, independent dev, lawful third party, court order)MandatoryWithout exclusions, NDA is overbroad and potentially unenforceable
Permitted disclosure (need-to-know employees/advisors)Strongly recommendedPrevents technical breach by normal business use
Obligations of the receiving partyMandatoryThe core of the NDA
Term and duration of obligationsStrongly recommendedPerpetual NDAs raise enforceability concerns; 2–5 years typical
Return/destruction on terminationStrongly recommendedOperational obligation; needed for data protection compliance
No license / no IP transferStrongly recommendedAvoids argument that disclosure implies license
Governing law and jurisdictionMandatoryWithout it, forum disputes arise
Injunctive relief / remediesStrongly recommendedMonetary damages rarely adequate for breach
Signature block and authorityMandatoryNo contract without valid execution
Entire agreement / no waiverOptionalGood practice; prevents prior discussions being cited

MSA (Master Services Agreement)

ClauseCategoryWhy it matters
Parties, recitals, and definitionsMandatory—
Scope of services / SOW mechanismMandatoryWithout it, what is the Provider obligated to do?
Fees, invoicing, payment termsMandatoryCore commercial terms
Term and termination (for convenience + cause)MandatoryWithout termination rights, parties are locked in indefinitely
IP ownership and licenseStrongly recommendedWork product ownership default varies by jurisdiction
ConfidentialityStrongly recommendedOverlap with standalone NDA if one exists
Liability capStrongly recommendedWithout it, liability is unlimited
Indemnification (IP, data breach, breach of warranty)Strongly recommendedAllocates risk for third-party claims
Warranties (authority, professional standard, no encumbrances)Strongly recommendedFoundation for claims in breach
Data processing / DPA attachmentMandatory where personal data is involvedGDPR/PDPL/UAE PDPL compliance
Governing law and dispute resolutionMandatory—
Force majeureStrongly recommendedEspecially for multi-year engagements
Assignment and change of controlStrongly recommendedPrevents counterparty selling the contract without consent
Entire agreement and amendment mechanismOptional but good practice—
Signature blocksMandatory—

Commercial Lease

ClauseCategoryWhy it matters
Parties (landlord + tenant) and registered entity detailsMandatory—
Premises description with planMandatoryDefines the demise
Term and commencement dateMandatory—
Rent and payment termsMandatory—
Permitted useMandatoryDefines scope of occupation
Repair obligations allocationStrongly recommendedWithout it, default statutory allocation applies (varies)
Service chargeStrongly recommended for multi-tenanted buildings—
Insurance obligationsStrongly recommended—
Assignment and subletting provisionsStrongly recommendedDefault varies by jurisdiction
Forfeiture / termination rightsStrongly recommendedWithout it, landlord's remedies are unclear
Reinstatement / make-good obligationStrongly recommendedExpensive disputes without it
Governing law and dispute resolutionMandatory—
Signature blocksMandatory—

Employment Agreement

ClauseCategoryWhy it matters
Job title and dutiesMandatoryDefines the engagement
Commencement date and probation periodMandatoryProbation must be specified — defaults vary by jurisdiction
Compensation (salary, benefits, bonuses)Mandatory—
Working hours and locationMandatoryMany jurisdictions regulate maximum hours
Leave entitlements (annual, sick, parental)MandatoryStatutory entitlements must be at least met
Termination notice periodsMandatoryStatutory minimums apply; contract must be at least equal
End-of-service gratuity (MENA)Mandatory in KSA, UAE, LB, EGStatutory calculation; omission creates liability
ConfidentialityStrongly recommended—
IP assignmentStrongly recommendedDefault varies by jurisdiction
Non-compete / non-solicitationOptional (enforceability depends on jurisdiction)—
Governing lawMandatory—
Signature blockMandatory—

Jurisdictional Mandatory Clauses

Some provisions are not merely "best practice" — they are legally required or have specific local form requirements:

UAE (onshore)

  • Governing law: UAE Federal Law No. 33 of 2021 (Labour Law) requires employment contracts in Arabic or bilingual
  • Penalty clauses in commercial contracts: UAE Civil Code allows courts to adjust disproportionate penalties regardless of contract terms (Article 390 equivalent); draft as indemnification rather than liquidated damages where possible
  • Real estate contracts: must be registered with the relevant Land Department to be effective against third parties

KSA

  • Arbitration clauses: must specify (a) the arbitral institution (SCCA or ICC or other recognized body); (b) the seat; (c) the language; (d) the number of arbitrators. A clause saying only "disputes shall be referred to arbitration" is insufficient and courts will assume Saudi General Court jurisdiction
  • Employment contracts: must be in Arabic; bilingual is acceptable; Arabic version prevails; must be registered with GOSI
  • Commercial Agency agreements: must be registered with the Ministry of Commerce

Lebanon

  • Bilateral commercial contracts of value ≥ LBP 1,000,000 (approx.): technically require written form under Article 254 of the Code of Obligations and Contracts (OCC) — though in practice this threshold is very low and most commercial practice is documented in writing regardless
  • Real estate transfers: must be registered before the Land Registry; private sale agreements alone are not effective against third parties
  • Commercial leases: Commercial Code and Law 160/1992 overlay private terms; some tenant rights cannot be waived

DIFC / ADGM

  • Contracts can be governed by DIFC / ADGM law respectively; no requirement for Arabic
  • DIFC Data Protection Law and ADGM Data Protection Regulations impose DPA requirements for any processing within those free zones
  • For employment: DIFC Employment Law No. 2 of 2019 (amended) and ADGM Employment Regulations require written employment contracts

Output Format

Missing clauseDocument typeCategoryWhy it mattersSeverity
Governing lawMSAMandatoryCourts will apply default forum rule; may be adverseCritical
Data processing agreementMSA with personal dataMandatoryGDPR/PDPL compliance obligationCritical
Liability capCommercial servicesStrongly recommendedUnlimited liability exposureHigh
Force majeureMulti-year leaseStrongly recommendedNo protection against closure eventsMedium
Return/destructionNDAStrongly recommendedData protection compliance gapMedium

Severity key: Critical = may make the contract unenforceable or expose to regulatory penalty; High = material legal risk; Medium = increased ambiguity or commercial risk; Low = best practice gap.

Limits

  • This skill identifies structural gaps; it does not assess quality of clauses that are present — use [[review-risk-flagging]] for that
  • Jurisdiction-specific mandatory provisions require verification against current law — statute amendments can change what is required
  • Document type classification must be accurate; if the document type is ambiguous, ask before running the checklist

Related Skills

  • [[review-risk-flagging]]
  • [[review-msa-deep-review]]
  • [[review-nda-quick-check]]
  • [[review-unusual-terms-detector]]
  • [[draft-contract-skeleton-builder]]
  • [[review-indemnification-balance]]

Last updated: October 13, 2026

Files (2)

Jurisdiction
General
Practice area
Contracts
License
MIT
Author
sboghossian
Source
general/contracts/skills/review-missing-clauses-sboghossian

Test Missing-Clauses Detector

Ask a legal question — get an answer generated live from this skill’s instructions.

Sign in to test this skill.