Construction Defect Complaint

Construction Defect Complaint

Drafts a litigation-ready construction defect complaint that pleads defect facts, satisfies pre-suit prerequisites, and survives early dismissal.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

1. Property: address, legal description, ownership chain, acquisition date
2. Project docs: contracts, plans/specs, change orders, warranties, completion dates
3. Defect evidence: photos, inspections, expert reports, repair estimates
4. Communications: notices sent/received, repair attempts, inspection access logs
5. Pre-suit requirements: notice statutes, opportunity-to-repair rules, certificate-of-merit rules
6. Limitations: statute of limitation, statute of repose, discovery dates, tolling facts
7. Defendants: entity names, roles, license info, registered agents, contract chain to plaintiff

Complaint Structure

Draft sections in this order:

1. Caption — court, parties, case number placeholder
2. Parties — plaintiff standing/ownership; each defendant's role and contract chain
3. Jurisdiction/Venue — subject-matter basis, personal jurisdiction, venue facts
4. Background — project scope, dates, contract price, warranties (attach contracts)
5. Defect Allegations — system-by-system using template below (attach photos/reports)
6. Pre-Suit Compliance — notice dates, method, responses, inspection access (attach notices)
7. Damages — repair costs, loss of use, diminution, consequential (attach estimates)
8. Causes of Action — separate counts with element-matched facts
9. Prayer — relief tailored to claims and statutes
10. Jury Demand — if requested
11. Verification — if required by local rules

Defect Allegation Template

Repeat for each defect system or location:

Defect: [Component/system]
Defendant(s): [Entity + trade role]
Observed condition: [Specific defect]
Discovery date: [Month/Year]
Manifestation: [Leak/crack/failure pattern]
Cause: [Improper install/material defect/design error]
Resulting damage: [Water intrusion, mold, structural movement, etc.]
Supporting evidence: [Report/Photo/Estimate ID]

Cause of Action Checklist

Include only claims supported by facts:

• Breach of Contract — contract + obligation + breach + damages
• Breach of Express Warranty — warranty terms + breach + timely notice
• Breach of Implied Warranty — habitability/workmanship/fitness + latent defect + damages
• Negligence — duty + breach of standard of care + causation + damages
• Negligence Per Se — code/standard identified + violation + causation
• Products Liability — product defect + commercial seller + causation + damages
• Misrepresentation/Fraud — who/what/when/where + reliance + damages (plead with particularity)
• Statutory Construction Act — jurisdiction-specific elements and preconditions

Damages Checklist

• Repair and remediation costs (itemized)
• Consequential damages (loss of use, relocation, storage)
• Diminution in value (if not fully repairable)
• Pre/post-judgment interest if authorized
• Attorney's fees and costs if contract/statute allows

Pitfalls

• Pre-suit notice is jurisdictional — always verify and plead compliance with right-to-repair/NOR statutes including dates, method, and responses
• No group pleading — allege each defendant's specific role; avoid collective allegations
• Economic loss doctrine — omit tort claims unless independent duty or property damage is alleged
• Statute of repose — plead discovery-rule facts to establish timeliness
• Code violations — do not assert without factual basis or expert support
• Exhibit strategy — attach supporting documents; avoid attaching anything that undercuts allegations
• Fraud pleading standard — federal court and most states require heightened particularity
• Jurisdiction-specific rules — check for pre-suit mediation, expert certification, or special pleading requirements

---

Key changes from the original:

• Trimmed the description from 352 to 230 characters while keeping all trigger keywords
• Removed tags from frontmatter (not part of the Agent Skills spec)
• Replaced the wide table with a numbered list — more scannable and token-efficient
• Converted the output structure from a 3-column table to a clean ordered list with inline exhibit notes
• Consolidated "Pleading standards" into the cause of action checklist (fraud particularity) and pitfalls (federal plausibility)
• Merged "Guidelines" do/don't list into a single Pitfalls section with bold labels
• Added proper markdown heading hierarchy (##) instead of bold-only section headers
• Kept the defect allegation template and all checklists intact — these are high-value structured content