IP legal-AI skills in 🇺🇸 United States

62 legal AI skills for ip in United States.

IP Litigation Deposition Supplement

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Provides IP-specific deposition examination frameworks for patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases. Covers inventor, infringer, licensing, and expert witnesses with question maps for claim construction, prior art, willfulness, Georgia-Pacific factors, likelihood of confusion, and trade secret identification. Use when preparing IP litigation depositions alongside @deposition-preparation and @deposition-expert-witness.

IP Portfolio Summary

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Summarizes and analyzes a U.S. corporate IP portfolio covering patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Use when conducting an IP audit, due diligence review, M&A assessment, licensing strategy, executive briefing, or portfolio optimization.

Joint Claim Construction Chart

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts Joint Claim Construction Charts for patent litigation Markman hearings in US federal courts. Organizes disputed claim terms with competing party constructions, intrinsic/extrinsic evidence citations, and agreement status. Use when preparing claim construction charts, Markman hearing exhibits, or joint prehearing statements in IP litigation.

Know-How License Agreement

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts U.S. know-how (trade secret) license agreements covering scope, exclusivity, field-of-use, territory, consideration, confidentiality, tech transfer, diligence, and compliance. Use when licensing confidential technical information, manufacturing processes, trade secrets, non-patent IP, or process know-how; trigger keywords: know-how license, trade secret license, technology transfer agreement, confidential information license, process license, technical know-how, manufacturing know-how.

Markman Hearing Brief

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts Markman Hearing Briefs for patent claim construction under the Phillips framework. Structures disputed-term analysis from intrinsic evidence (claims, specification, prosecution history) with local-rule-compliant formatting. Use when preparing claim construction briefs, Markman hearing submissions, or patent claim interpretation arguments in US federal court.

MPEP Search Skill

MITUnited StatesIP

Expert system for searching USPTO MPEP, 35 USC statutes, 37 CFR regulations, and post-Jan 2024 updates.

Notice of Prior Art

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts a Notice of Prior Art disclosing references material to patentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, with element-by-element claim charts and forum-specific compliance (USPTO 37 CFR 1.56, district court local patent rules, PTAB 35 U.S.C. § 311). Use when preparing invalidity contentions, duty-of-disclosure filings, inter partes review petitions, or pre-litigation prior art disclosures.

Patent Application Creator Skill

MITUnited StatesIP

End-to-end patent campaign from ANY raw material ("here is some information; make a patent") to a filing-ready provisional package - invention mining, worth-it economics (design-around cost, detectability), exhaustive adversarial prior art, claims-first drafting, machine-verified compliance, hostile-examiner attack pass, and an honest no-go when nothing clears the bar or the fence is not worth the money

Patent Creator Skill

MITUnited StatesIP

Expert system for reviewing utility patent applications against USPTO MPEP guidelines.

Patent Drafting

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Use when drafting patent applications, writing claims, analyzing prior art, or responding to office actions - covers USPTO practice, claim strategies, and specification requirementsUse when ", " mentioned.

Patent Infringement Analysis

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Generates a structured patent infringement analysis mapping claims to accused product features via claim charts. Covers Phillips claim construction, literal infringement, doctrine of equivalents, validity defenses, damages, and strategic recommendations. Use when analyzing patent infringement, preparing claim charts, evaluating IP litigation risk, or assessing licensing and design-around options.

Patent Infringement Case Summary

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Generates structured summaries of patent infringement cases covering parties, patents-at-issue, infringement theories, claim construction, damages, and outcomes. Use when summarizing patent disputes, creating case digests for IP portfolios, or onboarding to patent litigation matters.

Patent Infringement Complaint

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts a federal patent infringement complaint for U.S. District Court satisfying FRCP Rules 8, 10, 11 and Twombly/Iqbal plausibility. Covers direct (§ 271(a)), induced (§ 271(b)), and contributory (§ 271(c)) infringement with TC Heartland venue analysis and Halo willfulness. Use when initiating patent infringement litigation, drafting an IP complaint, or preparing a pleading to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

Patent Novelty and Non-Obviousness Check

MITUnited StatesIP

Assess patent novelty and non-obviousness against prior art. Use when user says "专利查新", "patent novelty", "可专利性评估", "patentability check", or wants to evaluate if an invention is patentable.

Patent Novelty and Non-Obviousness Check

MITUnited StatesIP

patent-search — USPTO 专利搜索

MITUnited StatesIP

Use when the user wants USPTO patent discovery, patent metadata lookup, application lookup, or downloadable patent candidates before ingest.

Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement (PIIA)

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts U.S. Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreements (PIIA) for employee or consultant onboarding. Use when drafting a PIIA, inventions assignment, proprietary information agreement, or onboarding confidentiality/IP paperwork. Covers invention assignment, DTSA immunity, prior inventions disclosure, and state-specific carve-outs.

Quality Control Provisions (Trademark License Exhibit)

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts Quality Control Provisions as an exhibit to a Trademark License Agreement, covering quality standards, inspection rights, sample approval, non-compliance remedies, and recall obligations. Use when drafting trademark license QC exhibits, brand standards compliance annexes, or IP licensing quality schedules. Protects licensor rights and prevents abandonment under the Lanham Act.

Scope Recon

MITUnited StatesIP

Survey project IP assets — trademarks, patents, OSS licenses, assignments.

/takedown

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Draft a DMCA takedown notice, triage one you received, or draft a §512(g) counter-notice. Use when asserting copyright through a §512(c)(3) takedown with the fair-use and perjury gates, when an incoming takedown needs triage into comply / counter / engage / ignore options, or when drafting a §512(g)(3) counter-notice with the consent-to-federal-jurisdiction gate.

Takedown

MITUnited StatesIP

Draft a DMCA takedown notice, triage one you received, or draft a §512(g) counter-notice.

Technology Tutorial for Court

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts a neutral, educational slide-deck technology tutorial for courts in patent litigation. Covers the technical problem, prior art, invention operation, and key terminology using plain language, analogies, and simplified diagrams. Use when preparing pre-trial or trial technology tutorials, claim construction primers, or judicial education presentations in IP disputes.

Trademark Cease-and-Desist Letter

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts a U.S. trademark cease-and-desist letter for pre-litigation enforcement. Converts case facts into a demand letter that establishes standing, documents likelihood-of-confusion or dilution exposure, sets cure demands, and preserves Lanham Act remedies. Use when drafting a "trademark cease and desist", "pre-suit trademark demand", "trademark infringement notice", or "notice before litigation".

Trademark Cease-and-Desist Letter

Apache-2.0United StatesIP

Drafts U.S. trademark cease-and-desist letters asserting ownership, documenting infringement, and issuing cure demands with deadlines. Trigger when the user needs a cease-and-desist letter, trademark infringement notice, brand enforcement demand, Lanham Act notice, or a demand to stop use of a confusingly similar mark.