Litigation legal-AI skills in 🇺🇸 United States

179 legal AI skills for litigation in United States.

Expert Report on Damages

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Generates a structured expert report on economic damages for U.S. commercial litigation. Produces Daubert-ready, FRE 702-compliant analyses covering lost profits, disgorgement, diminution in value, or reasonable royalty with full FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure. Use when the user needs a damages expert report, economic loss calculation, damages rebuttal, forensic accounting analysis, or expert disclosure for commercial disputes during discovery, pre-trial, or trial.

Expert Testimony Summarization

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Produces structured expert witness analyses covering qualifications, opinions, methodology, admissibility (Daubert/Frye), and cross-examination vulnerabilities. Use when evaluating opposing or retained experts during discovery or pre-trial, preparing motions to exclude, or developing cross-examination strategy.

Expert Witness Deposition

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts litigation-ready expert witness deposition workflows for U.S. federal and state matters, covering preparation, examination, and defense strategy. Use when handling expert depositions, Daubert or Frye admissibility issues, Rule 26(a)(2) or 26(b)(4) disclosures, qualification and methodology challenges, bias and compensation probing, prior testimony impeachment, or work-product objections.

Expert Witness Deposition

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Guides taking or defending U.S. expert witness depositions with Daubert/Frye methodology testing, Rule 26(a)(2) compliance, and Rule 702/703 foundations. Use when building expert deposition outlines, preparing Daubert challenge records, defending expert prep sessions, reviewing expert reports for admissibility, or creating expert testimony lock-in strategies.

Expert Witness Designation

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts expert witness designation documents satisfying FRCP 26(a)(2) or state equivalents. Covers qualifications, opinion summaries, methodology, compensation, and report integration. Use during discovery when disclosing retained experts to opposing counsel and the court.

Expert Witness Impeachment

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Surfaces inconsistencies, opinion shifts, methodological flaws, and credential discrepancies across expert reports, transcripts, CVs, and publications for impeachment, cross-examination, and exclusion motions. Trigger when the user references expert impeachment, expert report analysis, Daubert or Frye challenges, deposition prep against an expert, or credibility attacks on opposing expert witnesses.

Expert Witness Impeachment Analysis

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Analyzes expert witness materials (reports, depositions, CVs, publications) to identify inconsistencies, opinion drift, and methodological failures for impeachment. Produces a prioritized inconsistency register, cross-examination questions, and Daubert/Frye challenge assessment. Use when challenging expert reliability or credibility during discovery, pre-trial, or trial in commercial litigation.

Expert Witness Report Analysis

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Critiques opposing expert witness reports for admissibility challenges, disclosure deficiencies, and cross-examination vulnerabilities. Triggers when the user provides an expert report for analysis, needs Daubert/Frye assessment, requests a motion to exclude or limit expert testimony, or prepares deposition or trial cross-examination of an opposing expert.

Expert Witness Report Summary

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Generates structured, citation-anchored summaries of expert witness reports for depositions, hearings, and trial preparation. Distills qualifications, methodology, opinions, assumptions, and quantitative findings into a navigable reference. Use when summarizing expert witness reports, retained expert disclosures, or rebuttal expert reports in US litigation.

Expert Witness Report Summary

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Produces structured, citation-ready summaries of U.S. expert witness reports for litigation. Captures qualifications, assignment, methodology, materials, findings, opinions, assumptions, limitations, and quantitative results with pinpoint citations. Use when summarizing expert reports, preparing for depositions or trial, reviewing expert disclosures, or planning cross-examination.

Extracting Case Data for SC-100 Form

MITUnited StatesLitigation

Use this skill to extract and organize case data from a natural language case description for filling the SC-100 form. Maps case facts to form fields.

Fairness Hearing Notice

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts FRCP 23(e)-compliant fairness hearing notices for class action settlements. Covers settlement terms, opt-out rights, objection procedures, and hearing logistics. Use when notifying class members of a proposed settlement pending court approval.

Fill California Small Claims Form SC-100

MITUnited StatesLitigation

Use this skill to fill the California Small Claims Court form (SC-100) with plaintiff and defendant information, case details, and amounts. Requires actual field names from the PDF — run Extract PDF Form Field Names skill first.

Filling CA SC-100 Small Claims Court Form (Improved)

MITUnited StatesLitigation

How to fill California SC-100 Small Claims Court PDF form using fillable field IDs; includes complete field mapping, checkbox behavior, and field fill strategy.

Filling the SC-100 Form

MITUnited StatesLitigation

How to map and fill the California Small Claims Court form SC-100 (Plaintiff's Claim and ORDER to Go to Small Claims Court). Use this skill whenever the user mentions filling an SC-100 form or filing a small claims case in California.

Final Order and Judgment

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts court-ready Final Orders and Judgments for class action litigation with caption, procedural history, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and enforceable relief. Use when drafting final judgments, post-trial orders, summary judgment orders, or settlement approval orders in class actions.

Fraudulent Conveyance Complaint

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts a U.S. fraudulent conveyance complaint to avoid and recover debtor asset transfers under UFTA, UVTA, or state equivalents. Covers actual fraud (UVTA § 4(a)(1)), constructive fraud theories, badges of fraud, provisional remedies, and full prayer for relief. Use when a creditor needs to challenge a transfer made to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings. Triggers: fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, voidable transaction, badges of fraud, asset concealment, debtor insolvency, UFTA, UVTA, avoidance action.

Indiana Hearings — Preparation and Conduct

MITUnited StatesLitigation

This skill should be used when the user asks to "prepare for an Indiana hearing", "oral argument Indiana", "Indiana courtroom etiquette", "Marion zoom hearing", "Indiana virtual hearing", "WebEx Indiana court", "hearing day checklist Indiana", "Indiana evidentiary hearing", "Indiana CCS conference", "Indiana telephonic hearing", "Indiana bench trial", or any related hearing-preparation question. Covers oral argument in motion practice, evidentiary hearings, the statewide Webex remote-hearing protocol under Indiana Administrative Rule 14, courtroom etiquette, hearing-day logistics, exhibit handling, the role of the court reporter, and pro se conduct expectations. Trigger phrases: "Indiana hearing prep", "Marion oral argument", "Lake bench trial", "Webex Indiana", "Admin Rule 14", "Indiana courtroom protocol", "evidentiary hearing Indiana".

Interrogatory Response Summaries

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Generates structured summaries of interrogatory responses in commercial litigation, extracting key facts, objections, evasions, patterns, and inconsistencies per interrogatory. Use when analyzing opposing party interrogatory answers, spotting discovery gaps, or preparing for depositions.

JNOV Motion

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) under FRCP 50(b) or state equivalents, with alternative new-trial request. Builds element-by-element evidentiary insufficiency arguments using transcript citations and preserves the appellate record. Use when drafting JNOV motions, post-trial motions, renewed judgment as a matter of law, or challenging jury verdicts for insufficient evidence.

Joint Discovery Plan & Proposed Scheduling Order

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts Joint Discovery Plans and Proposed Scheduling Orders under FRCP 26(f) or state equivalents. Analyzes pleadings, court requirements, and case complexity to produce discovery timelines, ESI protocols, privilege procedures, and scheduling deadlines. Use when preparing Rule 26(f) reports, proposed scheduling orders, case management plans, or discovery frameworks after meet-and-confer.

Judgment Summary

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Produces structured U.S. litigation judgment summaries from court opinions or final orders. Use when summarizing a judgment, opinion, final decision, post-trial ruling, appeal outcome, or case disposition brief. Covers caption, procedural history, facts, issues, standards of review, holdings, precedent treatment, concurrences/dissents, disposition, and practical implications with pinpoint citations.

Jurisdictional Statement

Apache-2.0United StatesLitigation

Drafts jurisdictional statements for U.S. appellate courts establishing authority to hear an appeal, procedural compliance, and timeliness. Covers 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291/1292, FRAP Rule 4, state appellate rules, finality analysis, interlocutory exceptions, tolling, and cross-appeals. Use when preparing appellate filings, jurisdictional briefs, or responding to jurisdictional challenges.

Jury Duty Exemption Email Generator

MITUnited StatesLitigation

Drafts a formal, respectful email to a sheriff requesting exemption from jury duty based on caregiver hardship and health risks.