Litigation legal-AI skills in General

253 legal AI skills for litigation in General.

Case Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.

Case Summary Report

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Synthesizes multiple case summaries into one unified Case Summary Report. Triggers when the user has two or more case summaries, document analyses, or memoranda and needs them consolidated into a single report with patterns, contradictions, and gaps identified.

Case Theory Simulator

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when litigation counsel needs to stress-test competing case theories before committing to a trial or arbitration strategy. Evaluates multiple legal theories against the same fact pattern, predicts opposing-counsel responses, estimates settlement-value ranges, and recommends an approach. Applies across civil and common-law systems (DIFC, ADGM, UAE, KSA, LB, EG, UK, US). Links to the case fact-pattern builder for structured input.

Chargesheet Analyst (India)

MITGeneralLitigation

Analyses an Indian police report, chargesheet, final report, supplementary report, and annexed prosecution record for completeness, applicable law, offence elements, accused-specific role, witness and exhibit support, contradictions, digital and forensic proof, chain of custody, sanctions, limitation, jurisdiction, cognizance, and procedural defects. Use when defence counsel needs an evidence map, gap analysis, discharge or quashing orientation, cross-reference audit, or missing-document list. Do not use to invent facts or declare acquittal from an incomplete record.

Cheque Dishonour Complaint Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Tests and drafts a complaint for cheque dishonour under section 138 of India's Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 after the statutory notice process is complete. Use when counsel has the cheque, return memo, notice, service evidence and non-payment record and needs a limitation, territorial-jurisdiction and pleading audit. Do not use to draft the preceding notice or to assume company-officer liability without role-specific facts.

Cheque Dishonour Notice Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Drafts the statutory demand notice that precedes a cheque-dishonour complaint under section 138 of India's Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Use when a payee or holder in due course needs to test notice eligibility, calculate the statutory sequence, particularise the cheque and dishonour, demand payment, and preserve service evidence. Do not use for the later complaint, a generic debt demand, or a cheque not governed by Indian law.

/chronology

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Build or update a chronology from declared document sources and uploads — dated events extracted, de-duped, and tagged by significance per the matter theory. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a production or matter file, says "chron from the production" or "what happened when", or needs a working, statement-of-facts, or witness-specific timeline.

/chronology

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

从声明的文件来源和上传材料构建或更新大事记——提取带日期的事件、去重，并按案件理论标记重要性。当用户要求从证据材料或案件文件构建大事记或时间线，说"从材料中提取时间线"或"什么发生了什么时间"，或需要工作大事记、事实陈述或证人特定时间线时使用。

CIRP Timeline Checker

MITGeneralLitigation

Builds and audits a current Indian corporate insolvency resolution process calendar with legal sources, owners and delay consequences. Use after admission, during CIRP, before CoC decisions, for extensions or exclusions, or when checking regulatory filings and plan milestones.

Claim chart

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output. Use when the user asks for a claim chart, element chart, proof chart, infringement or invalidity contention, element-by-element mapping, or asks "what are we missing to prove [claim]".

Claim chart

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

构建或审查要件分析表——专利权利要求对照表（侵权、无效或审查）或民事构成要件分析表（任何诉讼请求或抗辩），每个单元格附精确引用，缺口检测为优先输出。当用户要求要件分析表、权利要求对照表、证据对照表、侵权或无效主张、逐要件映射，或问"我们证明[主张]还缺什么"时使用。

Claim Verification Analyst

MITGeneralLitigation

Verifies, quantifies and classifies creditor claims in an Indian insolvency process. Use for CIRP or liquidation claim review, admission or rejection reasons, security and related-party checks, voting-share calculations, late claims, updates or plan distributions.

Client Q&A Prep — Deposition, Witness Statement, and Mediation Coaching

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when an attorney needs to prepare a client for a deposition, witness statement, mediation session, or court testimony. Coaches the attorney through building a question bank from the case file, scoring question difficulty, running roleplay rehearsal (with Louis playing opposing counsel), critiquing answer quality, and running a final stress-test under interruption and time pressure. Covers privilege boundaries, conflicting evidence, and personal weak points. Produces a question bank, answer-coaching notes, and rehearsal log.

Cold start interview

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

诉讼插件首次配置——按角色分流（法务、律所律师、独立执业）、按立场分流（原告、被告、两者皆有），捕获风险校准、执业背景和文书风格，写入实践画像 CLAUDE.md。在全新安装时、用户想设置或重做实践画像时、或重新检查可用集成时使用。

Commercial Dispute Resolution

MITGeneralLitigation

Evidence gathering, precedent analysis, and position paper generation for commercial dispute resolution and claims management

Contract Reviewer

MITGeneralLitigation

Reviews an entire draft or executed commercial contract, or an expressly scoped set of related provisions, from one identified party's perspective and produces ranked risks, exact clause citations and negotiation recommendations. Covers general commercial contracts and, via specialist references, loans/facilities, leases/leave-and-licence agreements, and IP licences. Use for "review this MSA from the Buyer's side", "what should we push back on across this agreement", "review only the IP and confidentiality provisions", "review this facility agreement for the borrower", "review this commercial lease from the tenant's side", "review this trademark licence", or "conduct an exhaustive audit". Quick review is the default; focused and full-audit modes follow scope. Not for a neutral summary, obligation extraction, or version comparison. Distinct from investment-and-shareholder-agreement-reviewer, data-processing-agreement-reviewer, and government-contract-reviewer.

Court Order Compliance Checker

MITGeneralLitigation

Turns a court or tribunal order into a tracked compliance record — every obligation the order actually imposes, its deadline, the responsible party, the evidence needed to show compliance, and the risk of breach or contempt for each. Use this whenever a user needs an order tracked for ongoing compliance rather than analysed for its legal content — including phrasings like "what does this order actually require us to do and by when", "build a compliance tracker for this injunction", "are we at risk of contempt on this order", "confirm we've complied with every part of this consent order", or "track our obligations under this interim order". Distinct from case-law-analyst (extracts holdings and ratio from a judgment for research or citation purposes, not compliance tracking) and appeal-grounds-drafter (challenges an order rather than complying with it). Fires for any court or tribunal order, interim or final, that imposes an ongoing or time-bound obligation on the user's own matter.

Cross-Examination Key Points Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates a structured cross-examination summary from depositions, exhibits, and discovery organized by witness and theme with pinpoint citations. Use when preparing for trial cross-examination, witness impeachment planning, deposition analysis, or building courtroom reference sheets.

Cross-Examination Rehearsal — Build, Practice, and Score Your Cross

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when an attorney needs to build and rehearse a cross-examination of a witness — identifying prior inconsistent statements, generating leading-question sequences, mapping impeachment opportunities, and preparing for non-cooperative witnesses. Louis plays the witness in cooperative, hostile, or evasive modes with realistic memory failures and lawyer-coached cleanups. Produces a cross outline, impeachment files, and a scoring rubric. Applies across DIFC, ADGM, UAE civil, Lebanese, KSA, and international arbitration forums.

Cross-Examination Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates thematic cross-examination summaries from deposition transcripts, sworn statements, and discovery materials with precise page-and-line citations. Highlights inconsistencies, impeachable admissions, and favorable concessions in a trial-ready format. Use when preparing witness cross-examination, building impeachment strategy, or synthesizing testimony across multiple witnesses.

Damages Quantifier

MITGeneralLitigation

Builds a general civil or commercial damages claim head by head, using only the figures actually supplied — contractual damages (expectation and reliance loss), lost profits, wasted expenditure, interest, and mitigation adjustments — showing the arithmetic and flagging any head claimed without a supporting figure. Use for "quantify our lost profits from this breach", "work out the damages including interest and mitigation credit", "build the claim for wasted expenditure on this failed project", or "what does this damages claim total once we deduct what was mitigated". Distinct from compensation-quantifier, which is scoped to consumer claims — this is the general commercial/civil counterpart. A quantification tool, not a merits assessment; it does not decide whether liability is established.

Deadlines

MITGeneralLitigation

Track case deadlines — add, cross-case rollup report, update, complete, close.

Decision Record Verification

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Cross-references a judge's decision, court opinion, or final order against one or more hearing/trial/deposition transcripts to verify whether the record supports each finding. Produces strict dual-citation blocks with document names, page/line references, and verbatim quotes from both sources. Use when preparing appellate review, post-trial motions, record discrepancy audits, or transcript-based fact checks of judicial findings.

Decree Execution and Enforcement Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Plans and drafts Indian civil decree execution and enforcement applications, selecting a lawful mode against identified assets or obligations and accounting for limitation, stays, satisfaction, transfer and objections. Use after a decree or executable order exists. Do not use to relitigate the merits, assume assets exist, or enforce an arbitral award without first identifying the correct enforcement regime.