Litigation legal-AI skills in General

253 legal AI skills for litigation in General.

Delay Claim Letter Skill

MITGeneralLitigation

Draft a construction delay notice or delay claim letter with contract clause citation, cause classification, and critical-path impact narrative. Use when asked to write a delay notice, put the owner or GC on notice of delay, draft a time extension request, respond to weather or owner-caused delay, or paper a delay for a claim. Produces a notice/claim letter with the excusable-compensable classification, critical-path impact narrative, quantum placeholder, reservation of rights, and a records-preservation list.

Demand intake

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Pre-drafting context gathering for a demand letter — parties, facts, basis, leverage, BATNA, and privilege filters — written to a structured intake.md the demand-draft skill reads. Use when the user wants to prep a demand letter, run intake before drafting, or capture context for a payment demand, breach/cure notice, cease-and-desist, employment separation, or preservation demand.

Demand Intake

MITGeneralLitigation

Pre-drafting context gathering for a demand letter — parties, facts, basis, leverage, BATNA, and privilege filters — written to a structured intake.md the demand-draft skill reads.

Demand Letter

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a lawyer needs to draft a formal demand letter asserting a client's claim against a counterparty — stating the legal basis for the claim, damages suffered, supporting evidence, and a deadline for payment or response before legal proceedings are commenced. Applicable across MENA (UAE, KSA, LB, EG), DIFC/ADGM, and any specified jurisdiction; addresses the different formal requirements for pre-litigation demand in civil-law and common-law MENA contexts.

Demand Letter (Letter Before Action / Mise en Demeure)

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when drafting a formal demand letter (letter before action / mise en demeure) requiring payment, performance, cessation of conduct, or retraction. P0 litigation skill covering required inputs, structure, tone, and the jurisdiction-specific service and formality requirements for LB (notarial/bailiff service), KSA (licensed lawyer, bailiff), UAE (notarized via Notary Public), and common-law jurisdictions. The letter must be precise, factual, and function as admissible court evidence.

Demand Notice Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Drafts a pre-litigation demand notice — the formal letter setting out a claim, particularising the facts and the amount or relief demanded, and requiring specific action by a stated deadline. Use this whenever a user wants a formal demand sent before litigation — including phrasings like "draft a demand notice for unpaid invoices", "send a formal notice before we sue", "particularise this claim and demand payment", "draft a cease and desist with a deadline", or "prepare a legal notice demanding possession back". Side-specific — drafted on behalf of the sender, against a named recipient. Fires for any pre-litigation demand — debt, breach of contract, tortious claim, statutory notice — in any practice area.

Demand received

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

来函分流处理——提取关键字段、交叉检索案件组合、评估实质理由、 提出响应方案并附建议，必要时转交案件登记或律师函起草。 当用户说"收到一封律师函"、"审查这个来函"或附上来函要求评估时使用。

Demand received

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Triage an inbound demand letter — extract fields, cross-check the portfolio, assess merit, present response options with a recommendation, and hand off to matter-intake or demand-intake if escalation is warranted. Use when the user says "we got a demand letter", "triage this demand", or shares an incoming demand to evaluate.

Demand Received

MITGeneralLitigation

Triage an inbound demand letter — extract fields, cross-check the portfolio, assess merit, present response options with a recommendation, and hand off to matter-intake or demand-intake if escalation is warranted.

Deposition prep

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Build a deposition outline for a witness — pull their documents from the eDiscovery platform, organize topics around the case theory, and surface impeachment material. Use when the user says "depo prep for [witness]", "build a depo outline", or "prepare for [name]'s deposition".

Deposition Prep

MITGeneralLitigation

Build a deposition outline for a witness — pull their documents from the eDiscovery platform, organize topics around the case theory, and surface impeachment material.

Deposition Questioning Techniques

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates deposition question sequences using six core examination techniques (Funnel, Boxing-In, Looping, Three C's impeachment, evasive witness handling, admission ladders). Use when preparing deposition outlines, building question sequences for specific topics, impeaching with prior inconsistent statements, or controlling evasive witnesses.

Deposition Summarization

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Summarizes deposition transcripts with precise page:line citations. Supports sequential, topic-based, and strategic deep-analysis formats. Use when a user provides a deposition transcript and requests a summary, depo digest, testimony analysis, or impeachment identification.

Deposition Summary — Narrative

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Transforms deposition transcripts into topic-organized narrative memoranda with page-line citations, flagged admissions, contradictions, and credibility issues. Use when summarizing depositions, condensing transcripts for trial prep, or building case strategy during discovery or pre-trial phases.

Deposition Summary with Key Document Index

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates topic-based deposition summaries for commercial litigation with exhibit cross-referencing. Produces a two-column table (page:line | neutral summary) with embedded exhibit citations. Use when summarizing depositions, creating deposition digests, indexing exhibits, or preparing witness testimony summaries during discovery.

Deposition Transcript Analyzer

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Analyzes deposition transcripts to extract litigation work product including executive summaries, testimony indexes, admission compilations, impeachment maps, credibility assessments, motion/trial designations, and follow-up checklists. Use when reviewing a deposition for case strategy, summary judgment prep, trial prep, or post-deposition analysis. Triggers: deposition analysis, transcript review, testimony index, admissions, impeachment, trial designations.

Disclosure Request Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Drafts targeted requests for disclosure, discovery, inspection, production, interrogatories, admissions, or further information in litigation or similar proceedings. Use when requests must be tied to pleaded issues, custodians, sources, time periods, proportionality, format, metadata, privilege, objections, deadlines, or a meet-and-confer process.

Discovery Document Summarization

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates structured, citeable summaries of discovery documents (interrogatories, RFPs, RFAs, depositions, productions). Extracts admissions, inconsistencies, evidentiary gaps, and objections with precise source citations. Use when summarizing discovery responses, preparing for depositions, identifying discovery gaps, or building trial preparation materials.

Discovery First-Pass Tagging

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a litigation team faces a large document set in discovery or disclosure and needs to triage documents efficiently before senior attorney review. Performs automated privilege detection, responsiveness scoring, date filtering, witness-mention extraction, and anomaly flagging — reducing senior review time by 60–80%. Applicable in US discovery, UK/DIFC/ADGM disclosure, and international arbitration document production.

Discovery Request

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when drafting discovery requests — interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admission — for civil litigation proceedings. Covers proportionality, relevance standards, and compliance with procedural rules across jurisdictions. Relevant for disputes practitioners in UAE courts, DIFC/ADGM courts, Lebanon, Egypt, KSA, UK, EU, and US proceedings. Trigger when a client needs formal discovery instruments to compel disclosure of evidence from the opposing party.

Discovery Summarization

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Summarizes discovery documents (interrogatories, RFPs, RFAs, depositions, privilege logs) into structured attorney-ready memoranda. Triggers when the user needs to summarize discovery materials, identify key admissions, spot response gaps, cross-reference answers, or prepare a discovery status report.

Dispute Pre-Litigation Pack

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a user needs to prepare for litigation or arbitration — documenting a dispute, sending pre-action correspondence, evaluating claims and limitation periods, and deciding whether to file court proceedings or arbitration. Covers the full pre-litigation workflow from facts to filing decision, with MENA-specific limitation periods, arbitration clause analysis, and jurisdictional notes for UAE, KSA, LB, DIFC, and ADGM.

Dispute Resolution Mechanism — Fit-for-Purpose Review

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a lawyer needs to evaluate whether a dispute resolution clause — arbitration or litigation, institutional or ad hoc — is appropriate for the specific deal and parties. Reviews seat selection, institution, number of arbitrators, language, confidentiality, carve-outs for interim relief, and multi-tier escalation. MENA-focused: covers DIAC (post-2021 DIFC-LCIA absorption), LCIA, SCCA, ICC, and the critical distinction between DIFC/ADGM courts (common law) and UAE onshore courts (civil law) for enforceability of awards and judgments.

Document Review Protocol Builder

MITGeneralLitigation

Designs defensible document-review protocols for litigation, arbitration, investigations, or regulatory productions. Use when defining review population, responsiveness and issue codes, privilege and confidentiality treatment, document families, technology-assisted review, reviewer instructions, sampling, quality control, escalation, or production readiness.