Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

IP Assignment Agreement

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Drafts intellectual property assignment agreements transferring patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Covers conveyancing language, registration recordation, consideration, representations and warranties, and post-closing obligations. Use when drafting IP assignments, asset purchase IP transfers, or technology transfer documents.

IP Assignment Agreement

MITGeneralIP

Use when a user needs to draft an IP assignment agreement transferring ownership of patents, trademarks, copyrights, or trade secrets from an assignor to an assignee. Covers consideration, ownership representations, further assurances, and recordation obligations. Applies across MENA and international jurisdictions with guidance on civil-law notarization and registration requirements.

IP — Claim Drafting from Inventor Disclosure

MITGeneralIP

Use when a patent attorney or IP team needs to draft patent claims from an inventor disclosure document. Produces independent claims, dependent claims, and method/system/apparatus variants from a technical disclosure, with a claim chart mapping to prior art. A qualified patent attorney must review all output before filing. Triggers on inventor disclosure documents and patent claim drafting requests.

IP clause review

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Review the IP clauses in an agreement — assignment, ownership, license grants, warranties, indemnities. Use when reviewing IP terms in employment, consulting, SOW, vendor, or licensing agreements, when asked to check the assignment language or license scope, or when an agreement with IP provisions is pasted or attached.

IP Clause Review

MITGeneralIP

Review the IP clauses in an agreement — assignment, ownership, license grants, warranties, indemnities.

IP Due Diligence Checklist

MITGeneralIP

Use when conducting IP due diligence in connection with an M&A transaction, investment, or licensing deal. Generates a comprehensive checklist covering patents, trade marks, copyrights, trade secrets, licences, assignments, encumbrances, and ongoing/threatened IP litigation. Relevant for target-company evaluation across MENA, EU, UK, and US IP registries.

IP Licensing Agreement

MITGeneralIP

Use when drafting an intellectual property licensing agreement that grants rights to use a patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, or software. Covers exclusive, sole, and non-exclusive licenses across any territory and field of use, with full attention to royalty structures, audit rights, improvement ownership, and MENA-specific enforceability traps (commercial agency law, gharar, SAIP registration). Triggers on phrases like "ip license", "licensing agreement", "royalty deal", or "technology transfer".

IP Management

MITGeneralIP

Use this skill when managing patents, trademarks, trade secrets, or open-source licensing. Triggers on intellectual property, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, open-source licensing, copyright, IP strategy, license compliance, and any task requiring IP protection or licensing decisions.

IP — Office Action Response Drafter

MITGeneralIP

Use when a patent attorney needs to draft a response to a patent office action — addressing examiner rejections, making claim amendments, and advancing distinguishing arguments over cited prior art. Covers non-final rejections, final rejections, requirement for restriction, and obviousness/novelty arguments. A qualified patent attorney must review and file all responses. Triggers on a received office action document.

IP Ownership Clarity Review

MITGeneralIP

Use when reviewing contract clauses governing intellectual property ownership, assignment, and licensing across any engagement type. Covers work-product ownership, background IP carve-outs, foreground assignment language precision, moral rights, joint inventorship, improvements, open-source obligations, and registration formalities. Applies across jurisdictions with particular attention to US, UK, EU, DIFC/ADGM, Lebanon, Egypt, and France where moral-rights regimes differ materially.

IP — Patent Prioritization

MITGeneralIP

Use when an IP team or lawyer needs to systematically prioritize which inventor disclosures to file as patents. Orchestrates novelty screening, commercial value estimation, geographic filing strategy, deadline management, and cost-benefit analysis across MENA (UAE, KSA, LB, EG) and major PCT jurisdictions. Triggers on inventor disclosure submissions, GitHub commits, Drive documents, or Slack discussions flagged for IP review.

IP — Prior Art Search Orchestrator

MITGeneralIP

Use when an IP attorney or patent agent needs a systematic prior-art search to assess novelty and non-obviousness before filing or during prosecution. Orchestrates searches across USPTO, EPO Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope, Google Scholar, industry publications, and open-source repositories, then synthesizes a structured novelty and non-obviousness assessment. Relevant for MENA filings (UAE, KSA, EG, GCC) as well as US, EP, and PCT national-phase proceedings.

IP Research

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

IP data research tools for patents, trademarks, and related USPTO/EPO/JPO records. Use when: - Looking up patents by number (US, EP, WO, JP, etc.) - Searching patent databases by keyword, assignee, inventor, or classification - Getting patent family, citation, or legal status information - Checking USPTO application status, file wrapper, PTAB proceedings, or petitions - Searching office action rejections and cited references - Looking up MPEP or TMEP sections, or CPC classifications - Searching Canadian case law / IP statutes via CanLII (Federal Court, FCA, SCC, TMOB, Patent Appeal Board, Patent Act, Trademarks Act) - Searching official Canadian Federal Court case files and recorded dockets by party - Monitoring China SPC IP Court scheduled hearings and semiconductor-related court materials - Searching global IP statutes / treaties via WIPO Lex (~200 jurisdictions) - Finding patent or trademark assignments / ownership history - Fetching USPTO publication full-text data - Checking U.S. trademark status, prosecution documents, or mark images (TSDR) - Searching the U.S. trademark register (TESS) by wordmark, owner, or goods/services - Federal Circuit (CAFC) appellate opinions and PTAB/district/ITC appeals - USITC Section 337 patent enforcement investigations (EDIS) and tariff codes (HTS) - U.S. Copyright Office registrations and recorded documents (transfers, assignments)

IPランドスケープの評価

MITGeneralIP

技術ドメインまたは製品分野の知的財産ランドスケープをマッピングする。特許クラスター 分析、ホワイトスペース特定、競合他社IPポートフォリオ評価、実施自由（FTO）予備 スクリーニング、戦略的IPポジショニング推奨をカバーする。新技術分野でR&D開始前、 強力な特許ポートフォリオを持つ既存企業に対して市場参入を評価する時、投資 デューデリジェンスの準備、特許出願戦略の策定、新製品のFTOリスク評価時に使用する。

/irac

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Evalúa el análisis de caso del estudiante usando la estructura IRAC. Rúbrica: identificación del problema (25%), regulación (25%), aplicación (35%), conclusión (15%). Da feedback específico y accionable — NUNCA reescribe el análisis del estudiante. Usar cuando el usuario dice "evalúa mi IRAC", "corrige mi análisis", "revisa mi caso práctico", o presenta un análisis de caso para evaluación.

IRAC Practice

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Grade an IRAC essay for structure, issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization.

IRAC Structure (Issue / Rule / Application / Conclusion)

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Use when Claude must structure legal analysis as a formal Issue/Rule/Application/Conclusion memo, opinion, or briefing note. Applies across all jurisdictions including MENA (UAE, KSA, Lebanon, Egypt), DIFC/ADGM, UK, US, and EU. Triggers on requests for legal analysis, memo of law, legal opinion, advice note, or any analytical output requiring reasoned legal argument.

Ironclad

MITGeneralContracts

Ironclad integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Ironclad data.

ISO 27001 Compliance Skill

MITGeneralCybersecurity

Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.

ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management Skill

MITGeneralData protection

Expert ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, privacy information management, PIMS certification, PII controller or processor obligations, privacy risk assessment, Statement of Applicability for privacy, privacy by design, data subject rights, DPIA, records of processing activities, transitioning from ISO 27701:2019, GDPR alignment with ISO 27701, or any privacy management system topic. Also trigger for questions about Annex A.1 (controller controls), A.2 (processor controls), A.3 (shared security controls), or implementing a standalone PIMS without ISO 27001. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full ISO 27701 lifecycle from gap assessment through certification.

ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System Implementation

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Guides ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System implementation extending ISO 27001/27002. Covers Clause 5 PIMS-specific requirements, Clause 6 PIMS guidance for ISO 27002, Clause 7 PII controller guidance (Annex A), Clause 8 PII processor guidance (Annex B), gap assessment, and certification path. Keywords: ISO 27701, PIMS, privacy management system, ISO 27001 extension, certification, Annex A, Annex B.

ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) Skill

MITGeneralRegulatory

Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System. Also trigger for questions like "how do I become ISO 42001 certified?", "what controls does ISO 42001 require?", "how do I assess AI risk under 42001?", "what is an AIMS?", or any request involving organisational governance of AI systems, responsible AI frameworks, or AI regulatory compliance aligned to an ISO standard.

ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System Specialist

MITGeneralRegulatory

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running internal audits. Three decisions: (1) Where are the gaps against Clauses 4-10 and what do we close first? (2) What goes in the AI risk register and which Annex A controls treat each risk? (3) What's the 12-month internal audit plan that satisfies Clause 9.2? Use when preparing for certification, scoping internal audit cycles, or onboarding AI systems into an existing ISMS (27001) / QMS (13485) program. NOT an executive AI strategy skill (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT EU AI Act compliance (see compliance-team-eu-ai-act).

Issue Spotter

MITGeneralLitigation

Reads a fact pattern and spots every legally relevant issue, potential cause of action, and threshold problem — limitation, standing, jurisdiction, procedural preconditions — comprehensively rather than narrowing to the strongest-looking claim, and flags which deeper-analysis skill each issue needs next rather than analysing any of them in depth itself. Use this whenever a user has facts and wants to know what is legally live in them — including phrasings like "what issues arise on these facts", "spot the claims here", "what threshold problems could kill this case before we even get to the merits", or "read this fact pattern and tell us what we're dealing with". Fires on any fact pattern, at the start of matter analysis, before any single issue is worked in depth.