Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Adressatenwürde und Rechtssteuerung

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Für Adressatenwürde und Rechtssteuerung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Schnittstellenkarte mit Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen.

ADR Outcomes Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralArbitration

Generates structured summaries of mediation and arbitration proceedings, extracting outcomes, settlement terms, monetary amounts, obligations, releases, and enforcement steps. Trigger when the user needs to document mediation settlements, arbitration awards, or partial ADR resolutions from transcripts, agreements, mediator reports, or awards.

Adversarial Legal Review (English) - a red team for a high-stakes deliverable

MITGeneralGeneral practice

A red team for a high-stakes deliverable - takes a finished, high-stakes document (a legal opinion, a DD/M&A memo, a court/board submission, a recommendation) and runs an adversarial debate: a builder constructs the strongest version of the thesis, an attacker tears it apart with counter-arguments and contrary authority, a synthesizer reconciles, a verifier does a final check. Goal: find the weakness BEFORE your opponent, the court, or the client does. Cost-gated - for high-stakes work only, not every query (token-expensive). Use when: "attack this opinion", "red team", "devil's advocate for this document", "find the weaknesses", "stress-test the argument", "what will the other side say", "pre-mortem", "defend this thesis", "adversarial review", verifying a high-stakes deliverable before it goes out. English counterpart of adversarial-legal-review-pl (this version drops the Polish case-law layer and is jurisdiction-agnostic).

Adversarial Reviewer

MITGeneralLitigation

Attacks a finished draft the way opposing counsel, a skeptical judge, or a regulator would — hunting for exploitable ambiguity, gaps, internal inconsistency, and unsupported assertions, and writing out the strongest counter-argument to the document's own conclusions. Use this as a final stress test before a document goes out — including phrasings like "attack this draft before we send it", "what would opposing counsel do with this", "poke holes in this opinion", "find the weakest point in this pleading", or "red-team this before we file it". It finds problems; it does not fix them — hand off to the relevant drafting or redline skill for that. Fires on any finished draft in any practice area — contracts, pleadings, opinions, notices.

Agentische datenbank recherche

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Für agentische-datenbank-recherche: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Aggressive Advocacy Tone

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Applies aggressive advocacy tone to legal writing with forceful, adversarial prose, strong declarative framing, and minimal hedging. Use when drafting opposition briefs, responses to bad-faith conduct, compliance demands, trial briefs, or any document requiring zealous positional advocacy.

Agreement Document (WHAT)

MITGeneralGeneral practice

WHAT - Capture explicit agreements, terms, parties involved, dates, validity, and linked work items using the dots-ai Agreement Document structure.

AI4L - Main Skill for Evidence Review Creation and Auditing using @AGENTS

MITGeneralLitigation

AI4L - Main Skill for Evidence Review Creation and Auditing using @AGENTS

Aia generation

Apache-2.0GeneralRegulatory

Run an AI impact assessment — structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per regime in scope, policy consistency diff, and recommendation with conditions. Uses the house-style structure learned from the seed impact assessment in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "impact assessment for", "assess this AI use case", "run an AIA", "generate an AIA", "we need to document this AI system", "AI risk assessment for X", or follows a conditional triage result.

AI Content Detector

Apache-2.0GeneralRegulatory

Identify content generated by AI systems.

AI Disclosure Requirements Before Tribunals

MITGeneralFinance

Use when a lawyer or user indicates that AI-assisted work product (research, drafts, briefs, or submissions) will be filed with or presented to a court, tribunal, or regulatory body. Triggers the appropriate AI-disclosure reminder and citation-verification warning based on the forum's rules. Covers US courts (post-Mata v. Avianca standing orders), UK Bar Standards Board guidance, DIFC/ADGM courts, KSA/UAE onshore courts, French ordre des avocats, and EU AI Act implications. Hard-blocks any request to conceal AI use from a tribunal.

AI Governance Policy

MITGeneralRegulatory

Use when drafting an AI governance policy for an organization addressing responsible AI use, risk assessment, bias detection, transparency, human oversight, data handling for AI training, vendor evaluation, and incident response. Covers privacy and data protection practice area across MENA (UAE, KSA, EG) and global jurisdictions, with attention to emerging AI-specific regulatory frameworks.

AI Governance Reviewer Skill

Apache-2.0GeneralRegulatory

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

AI inventory

Apache-2.0GeneralRegulatory

EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorized representative, product manufacturer) and risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI, GPAI+systemic). Role and tier are assessed per system, not per company. Use when the user says "ai inventory", "add an ai system", "what systems do we have", "classify this ai system", "eu ai act register", or "ai system registry".

AI Tool Handoff

MITGeneralCorporate

Detects when Luminance, Kira, or a similar bulk-review tool is in use, hands off the high-volume clause extraction to it, and QAs its output per the trust level in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md`.

AI Tool Handoff

Apache-2.0GeneralCorporate

Detects when Luminance, Kira, or a similar bulk-review tool is in use, hands off the high-volume clause extraction to it, and QAs its output per the trust level in `config/local/codex-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "send to Luminance", "bulk review", "AI extraction", or when diligence-issue-extraction hits a high-volume category.

AI Use Policy generator

MITGeneralRegulatory

Generate a polished three-page AI Use Policy for the user's company. Researches the company and sector, drafts the full policy in chat for the user to validate, then writes a print-ready HTML file plus a sidecar JSON. Use when the user asks for an "AI policy", "AI use policy", "EU AI Act policy", "AI policy one-pager", or any request to draft, generate, or update a company AI governance policy. Aligned to EU AI Act Articles 4, 5 and 50.

AI Vendor Privacy Due Diligence

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Determines controller-processor relationships for AI services and conducts privacy due diligence. Covers SaaS AI (processor), embedded AI (joint controller), API-based AI (assessment framework), and vendor risk assessment. Keywords: AI vendor, controller-processor, due diligence, SaaS AI, joint controller, Art. 28.

AI 工具交接

Apache-2.0GeneralCorporate

检测 AI 辅助审查工具（如 Luminance、Kira 等）是否在使用中，将大批量条款提取 交接给工具，并按 `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md` 中的 信任层级对其输出进行 QA。当用户说"交给AI工具""批量审查""AI提取"或 diligence-issue-extraction 遇到大批量类别时使用。

AI知识产权文件生成

MITGeneralIP

AI-native IP skill: generate patent applications, software copyright materials, or technical disclosures from AI project code/papers/docs, with direct Word and PPT output. Covers 7 AI domains, 15 claim templates, patentability check, innovation mining, desensitization, prior-art search, and self-check.

Aktenaufnahme in Pfarrei, Ordinariat und Offizialat

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Für Aktenaufnahme in Pfarrei, Ordinariat und Offizialat: ordnet Akte, Belege und Lücken; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Allgemeiner Einstieg: CIC, Katechismus und pastorale Lage

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Für Allgemeiner Einstieg: CIC, Katechismus und pastorale Lage: routet Rolle, Frist, Unterlagen und Fachschritt; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Amendment history

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments, ek protokoller, zeyilnameler, and related variation documents. Produces either a chronological summary of all changes or a provision trace for a specific clause while preserving the original skill function.

Amendment history

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

追溯合同从基础协议到所有修订的变更轨迹——可以是所有变更的时间线摘要， 也可以是特定条款的追踪。当用户说"这个合同历次改了什么""显示修订历史" "最新的[条款]在哪里""[条款]如何演变的"或上传多个版本的协议时使用。