Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Legal Productivity

MITGeneralContracts

Legal productivity workflows for Copilot CLI: contract review, NDA triage, redline-risk, xref, evidence packs, response drafting, briefings, vendor checks, and style learning over existing legal documents.

Legal Project Management Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Generates structured legal project management summaries with RAG status indicators, budget variance analysis, and prioritized action items. Use when creating matter status reports, project updates, portfolio reviews, or resource allocation summaries for litigation, transactional, or regulatory matters.

/legalquants — where you are, and the one next step

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Your journey with AI as a lawyer, one next step at a time. Reads where you are — privately, from your own machine — and offers the one or two moves that make sense now. Trigger on "legalquants", "where am I", "what should I do next", "my journey", "getting started with AI". Never a menu, never a test, never for the legal work itself.

Legal readiness

MITGeneralRegulatory

Build or adversarially audit an evidence-first legal-readiness system for a software product, SaaS, AI app, API, marketplace, or website. Inventory every public and contractual claim; determine jurisdiction, operator, customer, data-role, payment-channel, and product-behavior applicability; compare prose with repository, live, vendor, registry, contract, and operational evidence; close authorized code/documentation gaps; and leave counsel, tax, filing, entity, and external-account blockers explicit. Use when asked for a legal audit, legal shield, SaaS legal baseline, terms/privacy/consent/payment review, compliance gap analysis, legal readiness, legal standing setup, product-claim substantiation, or to make an app legally safer before launch. NOT FOR giving legal advice, declaring a product compliant or legally secure, forming an entity, filing registrations or taxes, signing contracts, inventing operator facts, or replacing licensed counsel.

Legal Request Router EN - triage for a legal request

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Triage for a legal request. Looks at the question (and optionally the finished deliverable) and decides which verification path to run: plain answer, citation checking, adversarial review, or the full route. Scores complexity and risk and returns a routing decision with its reasoning and an ordered list of skills to run. A layer above the verification layer: it stops routine work from burning tokens on ceremony, and stops high-stakes work from shipping unchecked. Jurisdiction-neutral. Use when: "what should I do with this", "does this need a full review", "which path", "classify this request", "is this high-stakes", "triage", "routing" - at the start of a new legal request, before picking tools.

Legal Request Triage

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Triage incoming legal requests by classifying type, assigning priority based on urgency and business impact, and routing to the appropriate legal team

Legal Research

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Guides legal research from issue framing through authority collection, jurisdiction scoping, source prioritization, synthesis, and pre-filing updates. Use when planning or auditing legal research, building a research trail, developing rule statements, comparing authorities, or updating citations before filing.

Legal Research — 9 Skills

MITGeneralGeneral practice

9 legal research skills. Trigger: legal research, case law analysis, regulatory compliance. Design: legal databases, citation networks, and judicial analytics tools.

Legal Researcher

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Surface relevant case law, statutes, and regulatory frameworks for legal questions. Use when: find case law, legal precedent, statutory reference, regulatory framework, GDPR requirements, CCPA compliance, employment law, contract law research.

Legal Research Guide

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Legal research methods, case law analysis, and compliance tools

Legal Research Methodology

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Use when a user asks about legal research methodology, how to structure a research workflow, source-triangulation techniques, hypothesis-driven legal analysis, or how to find and verify primary and secondary legal authorities across MENA and international jurisdictions. Provides a comprehensive reference on research process design for legal professionals and AI-assisted legal tools.

Legal Research Planner

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Turns a broad legal question into a research plan — the specific sub-questions it breaks into, the source hierarchy to work through (primary legislation, binding authority, persuasive authority, secondary commentary), the jurisdictional boundaries, and a search strategy — before any substantive research is carried out. Use for "how should we research this question", "plan out our research before we start", "what sources should we actually be checking for this", or "scope this research question before we dive in". Distinct from issue-spotter (works from a fact pattern to spot live issues, not a research question to a methodology). Precedes precedent-mapper, statutory-interpreter, comparative-analyst, and legislative-history-analyst, which execute the tasks this skill scopes.

/legal-response -- Generate Response from Templates

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Generate a response to a common legal inquiry using configured templates, with built-in escalation checks for situations that shouldn't use a templated reply. Use when responding to data subject requests, litigation hold notices, vendor legal questions, NDA requests from business teams, or subpoenas.

Legal Review

MITGeneralContracts

Structures a systematic legal and compliance review of contracts, policies, or technical decisions — identifying key clauses, risks, and questions for counsel. Use when asked to review a contract, check compliance implications, flag legal risks in a technical design, or prepare for a legal consultation. Always surfaces work for qualified counsel; never replaces legal advice.

legal:review-contract — Contract Review Against Playbook

MITGeneralCommercial

Review an executed-or-draft B2B contract (MSA, SOW, SaaS agreement, DPA, license, partnership, contractor IP assignment, reseller agreement) against the organization's negotiation playbook — flag clause-by-clause deviations, generate redlines with fallback positions, and prioritize must-haves vs. concessions. Use when the user pastes or attaches a counterparty's contract and asks to "review", "redline", "negotiate", "flag issues in", "find risks in", or "give negotiation strategy for" that contract. Do NOT use for standalone NDAs (use legal:triage-nda), for auditing the user's own customer-facing legal docs like ToS, privacy policies, refund policies, or HIPAA notices (use legal:legal-audit), for listing what agreements are already on file with a vendor (use legal:vendor-check), for asking whether a planned action or feature is compliant with a regulation (use legal:compliance-check), for severity-by-likelihood risk scoring without a contract document (use legal:legal-risk-assessment), or for sending an already-finalized contract for signature (use legal:signature-request).

Legal Risk Assessment

MITGeneralContracts

Assesses and classifies LEGAL risks (contract exposure, regulatory liability, IP, privacy, employment, dispute, breach-notification) using a severity-by-likelihood framework with explicit escalation criteria and cited rationale. Use when the user says assess legal risk on [matter], classify the risk in this contract, what's our exposure if [scenario], does this need outside counsel, evaluate the legal risk of [deal/feature/action], or describes potential liability, contractual obligation, regulatory consequence, or litigation threat. Tie-breaker vs operations:risk-assessment — if the question is about LIABILITY, NOTIFICATION CLOCKS, REGULATORY CONSEQUENCE, or CONTRACTUAL EXPOSURE, use this skill; if it is about UPTIME, CAPACITY, OPERATIONAL CONTINUITY, or PROCESS FAILURE only (no notification clock, no liability claim), defer to operations:risk-assessment. A security incident with PII triggers BOTH skills (chain). Do NOT use for pure operational risks like outages, vendor downtime, capacity gaps with no legal exposure.

Legal Risk Assessment

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Generates structured legal risk assessment reports with categorized risks, 5x5 scoring matrices, and mitigation strategies. Use when preparing risk assessments, due diligence reports, transaction risk reviews, venture analysis, or board-level risk summaries.

Legal Risk Assessment Skill

MITGeneralContracts

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

Legal Risk Assessment Skill

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

Legal Risk Assessor

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Sets out the realistic options on a decision a client faces, with the downside risk, the likely outcome, and the best case of each — to inform the client's decision, not to make it for them. Use this whenever a user is weighing options and wants the risk of each worked through — including phrasings like "what are our options here and how risky is each", "should we settle or litigate, what's the downside of each", "lay out the risk of disclosing versus not disclosing", "what could go wrong if we sign versus if we walk away", or "help the client weigh this decision". Distinct from legal-opinion-drafter, which answers one legal question — this compares multiple options against what the client actually cares about (cost, time, certainty, relationship, reputation). Fires for any legal decision with more than one realistic path, in any practice area.

Legal Risk Visualization

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

法律风险结构化分析与可视化。基于法律分析文本，执行五步风险抽取模型， 生成四层可视化输出（雷达图数据、风险矩阵、影响路径图、决策树）。 适用于：(1) 用户提供法律分析报告要求风险可视化， (2) 要求风险结构分析或风险传导分析， (3) 要求生成风险决策建议或风险评估报告， (4) 提到"风险雷达图""风险矩阵""影响路径图""决策树"等关键词。

Legal Status Assessment

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Determine patent legal status — active, expired, pending, lapsed, or revoked

Legal Strategy Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Generates structured litigation strategy summaries synthesizing case facts, legal arguments, procedural tactics, and risk assessments into a unified roadmap. Use when aligning legal teams on case direction, preparing for strategy meetings, or onboarding stakeholders to litigation matters.

Legal Strategy Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Produces a litigation strategy summary aligning facts, legal theory, procedural tactics, discovery, and settlement posture into a single actionable roadmap. Use when asked for a case strategy summary, litigation roadmap, motions plan, risk assessment, or stakeholder alignment memo.