Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Skill：复盘、事项记忆与迭代学习

MITGeneralGeneral practice

在新证据、新陈述、新合同版本、新程序节点、新报价或用户目标变化出现后，需要延续同一事项记忆并更新报告时使用。

Skill：对方视角与抗辩模拟

MITGeneralLitigation

Simulates the opposing party's litigation and negotiation strategy by mapping their likely factual narrative, categorizing defenses, predicting evidence attacks, and designing counter-arguments with supporting actions.

Skill：案件摄入与争议焦点识别

MITGeneralLitigation

用于案件初始摄入阶段，将零散事实叙述转化为结构化案件概要，区分事实、推测、评价与法律结论，识别争议焦点层级关系及证据缺口，为后续证据台账、要件矩阵和策略分析提供基础。

Skill：案例参考与规则学习

MITGeneralLitigation

设计并执行案例、法规、判决文件和裁判观点的检索学习流程，优先使用所属国家/管辖权的官方来源，支持浏览器、官方网页、权威数据库和外部搜索工具，避免编造案例并提炼可迁移规则。

Skill：汇总与报告交付

MITGeneralGeneral practice

在复杂法律事项、案件分析、合同审查、合同起草或法律研究需要阶段性收口、会话实质汇总、报告或按需 PDF 交付时使用。

Skill：法官视角分析

MITGeneralLitigation

从法官、仲裁员或调解员视角评估请求清晰度、证据闭环、证明责任、裁判可执行性和风险。

Skill：法律文书与沟通文本起草

MITGeneralLitigation

起草、改写或审查法律相关文本，包括沟通信、事实确认函、律师函草稿、投诉材料、起诉状/答辩状框架、总结报告、合同审查总结和合同草案等。

Skill：法律要件与证明责任矩阵

MITGeneralLitigation

Breaks a legal claim into elements, maps each to facts and evidence, assigns burden of proof, and identifies evidentiary gaps and defense angles. Use when a party needs to assess what must be proved, by whom, and where the case is weak.

Skill：矛盾分析

MITGeneralLitigation

识别当事人陈述、证据、时间线、行为逻辑和法律立场之间的矛盾，生成追问和证明策略。

Skill：策略、风险与行动方案

MITGeneralLitigation

基于事实、证据、争议焦点、风险和用户目标，生成谈判、投诉、调解、诉讼等路径的行动方案。

Skill：隐私与范围守门

MITGeneralGeneral practice

隐私与范围守门技能，用于在用户描述纠纷或上传材料前，对敏感信息进行脱敏处理、确认法域和程序阶段、识别时效与高风险点，并过滤违法请求，为后续分析提供安全清晰的输入边界。

Slovak to English GDPR Translation

MITGeneralData protection

Translates legal articles from Slovak to English with strict terminology mappings for GDPR terms ('prevádzkovateľ' to 'Controller', 'sprostredkovateľ' to 'processor'), maintaining text structure and grammatical accuracy.

/socratico

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Método socrático de aprendizaje jurídico. Plantea preguntas al estudiante, escucha su respuesta, empuja con contraargumentos e hipotéticos. NUNCA da la respuesta directamente. Se adapta a la materia (civil, penal, administrativo, etc.) según la configuración del perfil. Usar cuando el usuario dice "método socrático", "pregúntame", "hazme pensar", "debate jurídico", o quiere practicar el razonamiento legal a través de preguntas.

Software License Agreement

MITGeneralContracts

Use when a software licensor needs to draft a license agreement granting a licensee rights to use specific software. Covers license scope, permitted users, use restrictions, fees and maintenance, IP ownership, warranties, limitation of liability, and termination. MENA-specific guidance addresses UAE copyright law treatment of software, enforceability of seat-of-use restrictions across MENA free zones and onshore entities, and the distinction between software license and SaaS agreements in Arab civil-law jurisdictions.

Software License Agreement

MITGeneralIP

Use when drafting a software license agreement for a commercial software product — covering license grant, license type (perpetual/subscription/term), user-definition model, updates and maintenance, IP indemnification, liability cap, and open-source disclosure. Applies to both on-premise and SaaS deployments. Includes attention to MENA-specific issues (data localization, PDPL compliance, SaaS regulation). Triggers on "software license", "saas agreement", "end user license", "EULA", or "software subscription" requests.

Software & POS System License Agreement

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

Drafts Software and POS System License Agreements for proprietary software use between licensor and licensee. Covers license grants, financial terms, IP, PCI-DSS data security, SLAs, and termination. Use when drafting POS software licenses, SaaS subscriptions, franchise technology licenses, or software distribution agreements.

Sort My Legal Inbox

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Sweep your inbox for legal stuff (contracts to review, NDAs, customer data requests, anything that needs a lawyer's attention) and tell you what needs you and what doesn't. I just sort and summarize, I never reply.

Space Industry — Legal Reference

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Use when a user asks about space law, satellite operations, launch licensing, spectrum regulation, sovereign space programs, or space commerce transactions in the MENA region (particularly UAE and Saudi Arabia). Provides a reference on the international and national legal framework governing space activities, including licensing regimes, liability, and commercial space venture considerations.

spec-contract — what must be in a design doc

MITGeneralGeneral practice

The content contract for a design doc — what must be IN it, as against make-spec which owns how it LOOKS. Synthesised from five primary sources read verbatim (Lynch/Refactoring English + his worked example, Design Docs at Google, the Rust RFC template, Nygard's original ADR post, Oxide RFD 1). The load-bearing rule is the cost of reversing a decision, not its importance: a choice fixable in an afternoon is review noise, a one-way door left unargued is the failure a design doc exists to prevent. Two layers. DETERMINISTIC — `scripts/spec_check.py` reads a markdown or HTML doc and decides 18 findings: required sections by class not by name, status resolvable and supersession pointed, >=2 alternatives with a stated reason for rejection somewhere in the section, non-goals that are declined goals rather than negated requirements, drawbacks that state a cost, acceptance that carries a number or a runnable command, and an implementation-manual detector for a doc with no trade-off language anywhere. JUDGMENT — `references/rubric.md` grades the five things a script cannot: whether the documented decisions are the expensive ones, whether the alternatives are real or strawmen, whether the non-goals are load-bearing, whether trade-offs are argued or merely mentioned, and whether the first screen is legible to the widest expected reader. Use when: (1) writing or reviewing a spec, plan, ADR, RFD or design doc, (2) deciding whether something warrants a design doc at all, (3) gating a doc before it goes out for review, (4) asked what belongs in a spec or why a spec is weak. Triggers on 'spec contract', 'design doc', 'write a spec', 'review this spec', 'is this spec any good', 'what belongs in a design doc', 'ADR', 'RFD', 'non-goals', 'alternatives considered', 'spec review', 'spec gate', 'design review', 'one-way door', 'reversal cost'.

Special Category Data Classification — GDPR Art. 9

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Identifies and classifies GDPR Art. 9 special category data including racial origin, political opinions, religious beliefs, trade union membership, genetic, biometric, health, and sexual orientation data. Covers processing conditions under Art. 9(2)(a)-(j). Keywords: special category, Art 9, sensitive data, biometric, genetic, health data, explicit consent.

Specification Writing: Section-by-Section Patent Description

MITGeneralIP

Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.

Spontane Ordnung, Gewohnheit und Custom: Red-Team

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Für Spontane Ordnung, Gewohnheit und Custom: Red-Team: prüft Ergebnis, Beweislast und Gegenposition; Ergebnis: Gegenprüfung mit Beweis- und Fristencheck.

Sportrechtliches Mandat eintrifft und muss strukturiert erfasst werden: Mandantenrolle Sachgebiet Sofort-Fristen

Apache-2.0GeneralSports

Für Mandat Triage Sportrecht: routet Rolle, Frist, Unterlagen und Fachschritt; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Sports Law Case Summaries

Apache-2.0GeneralSports

Generates structured summaries of sports law cases covering contract disputes, doping violations, and governance controversies. Use when summarizing sports litigation, researching athlete contract disputes, anti-doping arbitration, league antitrust challenges, NCAA eligibility cases, or CAS proceedings.