Key questions (ask first)

Use during AI system intake review, conformity assessment planning, or scoping deployer/provider obligations under EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) — classifies risk tier, picks the Article 43 route, and tracks per-role obligations. Cites Articles. Not legal advice.

Article-cited operational compliance for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Three decisions, not executive AI strategy, not a legal substitute. Cite Articles + Annexes for every output; engage outside counsel for novel cases (GPAI determination, Art. 6(2) carve-out, "substantial modification").

Key questions (ask first)

Does it fall under Article 5 (prohibited)? Annex III (high-risk)? What org role (provider/deployer/importer/distributor)? Is it a GPAI model (Arts 51-55, stricter above 10²⁵ FLOPs)? For high-risk: Article 9 risk management + Article 27 FRIA done? Which Article 43 Module?

1. Risk classification (exactly one of four tiers)

TierSourceObligations
ProhibitedArt. 5 (social scoring, workplace/education emotion recognition, subliminal manipulation, real-time public biometrics)Cannot place/use (up to €35M / 7% turnover)
High-riskArt. 6 + Annex III (8 cats: biometrics, critical infra, education, employment, essential services, law enforcement, migration, justice)Arts 8-17 (provider) + Art. 26 (deployer); conformity assessment; CE marking
Limited-riskArt. 50 (chatbots, deepfakes)Transparency disclosures
Minimal-riskDefault (spam filters, game AI)None (voluntary codes, Art. 95)
Art. 6(3) carve-outs (NOT high-risk if): narrow procedural task / improves prior human activity / detects patterns without replacing human assessment / preparatory task. Caveat: profiling of natural persons is always high-risk.

2. Conformity assessment + Annex IV docs (Art. 43)

  • Module A (Annex VI) — internal control / self-assessment; most Annex III systems with harmonised standards.
  • Module H (Annex VII) — full QMS + notified body; required for biometrics (Art. 43(1)). Annex IV technical documentation: general description · system elements (architecture, training data, validation) · monitoring/control · Art. 9 risk management · post-market changes · harmonised standards · EU declaration of conformity (Art. 47) · post-market monitoring (Art. 72). Then affix CE marking (Art. 48), register in EU database (Art. 71).

3. Per-role obligations

RoleArticlesKey obligations
Provider (3(3))8-17, 47, 49, 72Conformity, CE marking, risk mgmt, data governance, post-market monitoring, serious-incident reporting (Art. 73)
Deployer (3(4))26Use per instructions, human oversight, input data quality, record-keeping, inform workers (26(7)), FRIA if public/essential (Art. 27)
Importer (3(6))23Verify conformity + CE + docs
Distributor (3(7))24Verify CE + docs before making available
Authorized rep (22)22Non-EU providers must appoint; liable for provider obligations
Art. 25: a deployer who substantially modifies a high-risk system, or places it under their own name, becomes a provider.

Workflows

Intake review (~2h): document characteristics → classify → if high-risk plan conformity → identify roles → cross-check GDPR DPIA (if personal data) + ISO 42001 evidence → output classification memo + conformity plan + obligation list. Annex IV build (2-4wk): planner checklist → assemble docs (reuse ISO 42001 / 27001 evidence) → Art. 9 lifecycle → sign declaration AFTER assessment → CE mark → EU DB registration. Pre-deployment audit: confirm classification, conformity (if high-risk), Art. 50 transparency, Art. 72 monitoring live, Art. 73 incident reporting documented, deployer FRIA + workers informed, GPAI obligations. Annual refresh: re-classify (Art. 5 list expands via delegated acts), re-run obligations (Title III phases 2025→2027), verify monitoring + incident capacity, update Annex IV (Art. 11 ongoing).

Output standard

Bottom line (classification + most-significant obligation) · Article citation (don't paraphrase without cite) · the decision · evidence (Article + Annex refs + confidence) · how to act (3 steps, owner + deadline) · the call for compliance officer/legal (risk-class disputes, novel cases, GPAI threshold).

Last updated: October 13, 2026

Files (2)

Jurisdiction
🇪🇺 European Union
Practice area
Regulatory
License
MIT
Author
aashutosh396
Source
eu/regulatory/skills/eu-ai-act-specialist-aashutosh396

Test Key questions (ask first)

Ask a legal question — get an answer generated live from this skill’s instructions.

Sign in to test this skill.

Key questions (ask first) · ThomasMore AI