Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Child Custody Agreement (Post-Divorce / Separation)

MITGeneralFamily

Use when drafting a child custody and parenting arrangement agreement following divorce or separation. Jurisdiction-sensitive across MENA (hadanah/wilayah split in KSA, UAE, Egypt), Lebanon's 18 confessional courts, and civil-law jurisdictions. Covers physical custody, visitation, decision-making authority, child support, travel consent, and relocation. Always paired with court-ratification advice — most MENA jurisdictions require ratification to give the agreement enforcement weight.

Children's Privacy Notice Design

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Designs and implements privacy notices for children that comply with GDPR Articles 12-14, UK AADC Standard 4, and COPPA Section 312.4. Covers plain language, visual explanations, layered information, age-appropriate vocabulary, and interactive notice elements. Keywords: children privacy notice, transparency, plain language, visual, age-appropriate, layered notice.

/chronology

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Build or update a chronology from declared document sources and uploads — dated events extracted, de-duped, and tagged by significance per the matter theory. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a production or matter file, says "chron from the production" or "what happened when", or needs a working, statement-of-facts, or witness-specific timeline.

/chronology

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

从声明的文件来源和上传材料构建或更新大事记——提取带日期的事件、 去重，并按案件理论标记重要性。当用户要求从证据材料或案件文件 构建大事记或时间线，说"从材料中提取时间线"或"什么发生了什么时间"， 或需要工作大事记、事实陈述或证人特定时间线时使用。

Chronology

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Build or update a chronology from declared document sources and uploads — dated events extracted, de-duped, and tagged by significance per the matter theory.

CIRP Timeline Checker

MITGeneralLitigation

Builds and audits a current Indian corporate insolvency resolution process calendar with legal sources, owners and delay consequences. Use after admission, during CIRP, before CoC decisions, for extensions or exclusions, or when checking regulatory filings and plan milestones.

CISG-Prüfung

Apache-2.0GeneralCommercial

Für CISG-Prüfung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Citation extraction - find every citation before you check it

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Extracts the legal citations from an English-language text by pattern and rule, with no LLM in the extraction step, so the same text yields the same list every run - ECLI (CJEU and national), EU act identifiers (CELEX, Official Journal references, Regulation and Directive numbers), case names, and cited provisions (Article/section). It then normalises, deduplicates and resolves short references (ibid., id., supra, op. cit., the above-cited judgment) to their antecedent. The front end to verification: collect what is cited, then check it. Unusual or malformed citation formats can still be missed, so treat the output as a working list rather than a guarantee. Jurisdiction-neutral, EU-aware. Use when: "list every citation in this text", "what authorities are cited", "extract the provisions", "pull the case references", "what is cited here" - before verification or before sending.

Citation Integrity Checker

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Extracts every citation in a document — statute, case, rule, regulation, quotation, or cross-reference — and states exactly what needs verifying about it and how, attempting live verification where research tools are available this session and producing a structured checklist where they are not. Use this whenever a document's citations need checking before anyone relies on them — including phrasings like "check every citation in this opinion before we send it", "verify these case references are real", "does this quote actually say what we're attributing to it", "audit the citations in this pleading", or "make sure none of these sections are made up". Directly responsive to the risk this whole practice pack warns about — an AI-assisted draft can produce a citation that looks correct and is not. Fires on any document containing legal citations, quotations, or cross-references, in any practice area.

cite2footnote

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Convert hyperlinked citations in a Word document (.docx) to Bluebook-formatted footnotes or endnotes. Use when the user mentions bluebook, footnote, endnote, citation conversion, or asks to convert citations.

cite-check — Copilot CLI Skill

MITGeneralData protection

Verifiable legal-citation tooling for product counsel reviews. Two modes: (1) ORIGINATE — turn a PPL issue into a Word document of Citation Cards where every flagged risk is anchored by two highlighted quotes (legal source + product fact), byte-for-byte verified before write. (2) PRESSURE-TEST — given an existing review the user has already done, validate that each flagged risk is backed by verbatim, publicly-citable text on both the legal and factual sides, and surface gaps (paraphrased law, missing facts, internal-only sources used as primary cites).

Cite Recon

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Survey open legal questions and research gaps in the project.

Claim chart

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output. Use when the user asks for a claim chart, element chart, proof chart, infringement or invalidity contention, element-by-element mapping, or asks "what are we missing to prove [claim]".

Claim chart

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

构建或审查要件分析表——专利权利要求对照表（侵权、无效或审查）或 民事构成要件分析表（任何诉讼请求或抗辩），每个单元格附精确引用， 缺口检测为优先输出。当用户要求要件分析表、权利要求对照表、 证据对照表、侵权或无效主张、逐要件映射，或问"我们证明[主张]还缺什么"时使用。

Claim Chart

MITGeneralIP

Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output.

Claim Parsing

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Patent claim syntax parsing — independent/dependent relationships and element extraction

Claims Documentation

MITGeneralConstruction

Document construction claims for disputes and recovery. Compile evidence, calculate damages, track notice requirements, and prepare claim packages.

Claims Drafting: The Core Patent Skill

MITGeneralIP

Draft patent claims for an invention. Use when user says "撰写权利要求", "draft claims", "写权利要求书", "claim drafting", or wants to create patent claims. The core skill of the patent pipeline.

Claim Verification Analyst

MITGeneralLitigation

Verifies, quantifies and classifies creditor claims in an Indian insolvency process. Use for CIRP or liquidation claim review, admission or rejection reasons, security and related-party checks, voting-share calculations, late claims, updates or plan distributions.

Claude for Legal

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Legal workflow drafting, triage, review, research planning, legal operations, law-student or clinic support, and legal AI governance adapted from Anthropic claude-for-legal. Use for commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, regulatory, AI governance, IP, litigation, legal-clinic, and law-student tasks. Draft-only; attorney review and current source verification required.

Claude review

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

Agentic contract review using superdoc-redlines. Spawns parallel sub-agents for comprehensive document review with tracked changes.

Clause checklist - what a contract is missing, and what bites

MITGeneralContracts

A clause checklist for a single contract - walks the contract against 41 clause categories (the CUAD taxonomy), assesses which of them this deal needs, and marks each applicable one present / absent / risky, so the clause that should be there but is missing does not slip through. Extractive (quotes the contract, does not paraphrase). Common-law native, jurisdiction-neutral framing. Different from a bulk audit - this goes deep on one contract and asks "what is missing and what bites here". Pairs with adversarial-legal-review-en and reviewer-en. Use when: "check the clauses in this contract", "what is missing from this agreement", "clause spotting", "contract checklist", "review a single contract", "which clauses are risky" - before signing, in negotiation, or in DD of one contract.

Clause Comparator

MITGeneralContracts

Compares the same clause or provision across draft rounds, precedents, public agreements or a portfolio and reports what differs in wording and effect. Use for version-change requests and external clause benchmarking, including "what changed between drafts", "compare their indemnity with ours", "compare liability caps across these SaaS agreements", "what indemnity approach is most common in public SaaS agreements", "what is typical", "what is prevalent" or "is this market standard". External frequency claims require a disclosed multi-document sample, not one precedent. Distinct from contract-reviewer, which grades an agreement for risk; this stays neutral unless a side is given. Fires for any clause type in any commercial agreement.

Clause Library Check

MITGeneralContracts

Use when a transactional team needs to verify that a contract uses the firm's or client's preferred standard clauses and flag deviations. Parses contract clauses, maps them against a firm clause library, highlights non-standard language, suggests replacement with the library version, and tracks which clauses deviate most frequently as a knowledge-base feedback loop. Applicable across MENA and multi-jurisdiction commercial contracts.