Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Case Assessment Memo

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a litigator or disputes lawyer needs to produce a structured case assessment memo for a client, covering facts, legal issues, strengths/weaknesses, estimated outcomes and damages, and strategic recommendations. Applicable across MENA civil-law courts (Lebanon, UAE onshore, KSA, Egypt), DIFC/ADGM common-law courts, ICC/DIAC/LCIA arbitration, and any other forum once the jurisdiction is specified.

Caseblocks

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Caseblocks integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Caseblocks data.

Case Brief

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Summarizes a legal case into a structured brief covering key facts, issues, holdings, and reasoning. Use when you need a concise breakdown of a court opinion for study or analysis.

Case Brief Generation

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Generates structured case briefs from judicial opinions. Use when the user provides a court opinion and needs a case brief, case summary, or distillation of a judicial decision for legal research.

Case-Law Research

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

Use when the user asks to find, read, or cite U.S. case law on a question — locating controlling or persuasive decisions via CourtListener, reading the opinion text, and grounding any statement in what the source actually says.

Case Law Research Prompt

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a disputes lawyer, in-house counsel, or legal researcher needs a structured case law research output on a specific legal topic, covering leading authorities, their facts, legal principles, court decisions, and practical takeaways for practitioners. Designed for MENA, DIFC/ADGM, GCC, UK, EU, and any specified jurisdiction; acknowledges that case law plays a different role in civil-law versus common-law systems.

Case Law Search

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a lawyer or researcher needs to find relevant court decisions or arbitral awards on a specific legal issue in a specific jurisdiction. Covers primary MENA courts (Lebanese Cassation, KSA General/Commercial/Labor courts, UAE onshore, DIFC Courts, ADGM Courts) as well as UK, EU, France, and US sources. Triggers on queries about precedent, case outcome, how courts have interpreted a rule, or whether a position is "good law." Never fabricates citations; says so if no verified case is found.

Case Manage

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

用户用自然语言提供一个或多个案件的基本信息，需要新增案件记录、更新案件字段、查询待办或管理提醒时，优先匹配 case-manage；/案件录入、/case-manage、/案件更新 或 /case-update 仅作为强制入口。

사건기록 검색 스킬 (case-records)

MITGeneralLitigation

사무소 과거 사건기록과 작성서류를 로컬 FTS로 검색. 명시적으로 외부 임베딩을 허용한 환경에서는 하이브리드 검색도 가능. 주장서면·신청서면 위주로 "비슷한 사건이 있었나, 우리가 어떻게 주장했나, 어떤 신청을 했나"에 답한다. 사건 0건일 때는 검색 시도하지 말고 사용자에게 추가 안내.

Case Summarizer (Public Tool)

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when a user pastes or links a court judgment URL and needs a structured plain-English summary — covering facts, legal issue, holding, reasoning, and practical implications. This is a free public-facing tool with multi-jurisdictional coverage including DIFC, ADGM, UK (BAILII), US federal (CourtListener), and ECJ; limited for KSA and UAE onshore where public full-text databases are restricted. Designed as a lead-generation entry point with a daily free usage limit.

Case Summary

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.

Case Summary Report

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Synthesizes multiple case summaries into one unified Case Summary Report. Triggers when the user has two or more case summaries, document analyses, or memoranda and needs them consolidated into a single report with patterns, contradictions, and gaps identified.

Case Theory Simulator

MITGeneralLitigation

Use when litigation counsel needs to stress-test competing case theories before committing to a trial or arbitration strategy. Evaluates multiple legal theories against the same fact pattern, predicts opposing-counsel responses, estimates settlement-value ranges, and recommends an approach. Applies across civil and common-law systems (DIFC, ADGM, UAE, KSA, LB, EG, UK, US). Links to the case fact-pattern builder for structured input.

Caucus Strategy Planner

MITGeneralArbitration

Plans what a party should disclose, hold back, or route through the mediator during a private mediation caucus — sorting information into what to tell the mediator only versus what to authorise for the other side, protecting the bottom line by default, and never assuming the mediation's confidentiality rules without confirming them. Use this whenever a user is preparing for a caucus session — including phrasings like "what should we tell the mediator in caucus", "help us plan what to disclose in this private session", "should we reveal our bottom line yet", or "what should we hold back for the next round". Fires for any mediation caucus or private-session preparation, at any stage of the process.

CCP Classification

Apache-2.0GeneralAntitrust

Classifies the treatment of Competition Compliance Programmes (CCPs) in competition law enforcement documents. Converts PDF input, detects language, analyzes the full document, produces a scratchpad, and populates Output.xlsx. Use when classifying how a CCP is treated as an offence, defence, remedy, or irrelevant in a policy document or case/judgment.

Cease desist

Apache-2.0GeneralIP

Draft a cease-and-desist letter (send mode) or triage one you received (receive mode). Use when asserting your rights against an infringer with a demand letter calibrated to your enforcement posture, or when an incoming C&D needs triage into a structured options memo with a recommendation.

Cease Desist

MITGeneralIP

Draft a cease-and-desist letter (send mode) or triage one you received (receive mode).

CEET — Legal / Compliance

MITGeneralContracts

Cognitive Extraction Engine for in-house legal counsel and compliance leads in software companies. Use when a user wants to clone a legal/compliance operator's judgment — how they review contracts, weigh risk, respond to regulatory questions, draft policy, and advise the business. Trigger on phrases like "extract my legal thinking", "clone our GC", "build an AI that reviews contracts like me", "interview me about compliance", "capture my risk framework", "make a legal cognitive clone". Outputs are tool-agnostic.

Certified vs Sworn Translation

MITGeneralContracts

Use whenever a user is preparing documents for court filing, government registration, cross-border authentication, or any official purpose in a MENA jurisdiction that requires translation from or into Arabic or another language. Defines the four levels of translation authority (machine, self-certified, certified, sworn), maps jurisdiction-specific requirements for LB/KSA/UAE/EU, identifies the end-use determination step, and flags the common error of commissioning the wrong translation authority level.

Challenge to Arbitrator

MITGeneralArbitration

Use when a party to arbitration needs to draft a formal challenge to an arbitrator based on conflicts of interest, lack of impartiality, or lack of independence. Covers ICC, LCIA, DIAC, ADGM, SIAC, and UNCITRAL rules; addresses the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest; and flags MENA-specific considerations including challenge procedures under UAE, DIFC, KSA, and Lebanon arbitration law.

Chargesheet Analyst (India)

MITGeneralLitigation

Analyses an Indian police report, chargesheet, final report, supplementary report, and annexed prosecution record for completeness, applicable law, offence elements, accused-specific role, witness and exhibit support, contradictions, digital and forensic proof, chain of custody, sanctions, limitation, jurisdiction, cognizance, and procedural defects. Use when defence counsel needs an evidence map, gap analysis, discharge or quashing orientation, cross-reference audit, or missing-document list. Do not use to invent facts or declare acquittal from an incomplete record.

Check Relocation Documents

MITGeneralGeneral practice

Verificar la completitud de documentos para cada paso burocrático de una reubicación UE/DACH, señalando elementos faltantes y requisitos de traducción. Usar después de crear un plan de reubicación y antes de comenzar procedimientos burocráticos, al prepararse para una cita específica (Buergeramt, Finanzamt), cuando no se está seguro de qué documentos necesitan traducción certificada o apostilla, después de recibir un rechazo o solicitud de documentos adicionales, o como verificación periódica durante el proceso de reubicación para asegurar que nada se haya pasado por alto.

Cheque Dishonour Complaint Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Tests and drafts a complaint for cheque dishonour under section 138 of India's Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 after the statutory notice process is complete. Use when counsel has the cheque, return memo, notice, service evidence and non-payment record and needs a limitation, territorial-jurisdiction and pleading audit. Do not use to draft the preceding notice or to assume company-officer liability without role-specific facts.

Cheque Dishonour Notice Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Drafts the statutory demand notice that precedes a cheque-dishonour complaint under section 138 of India's Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Use when a payee or holder in due course needs to test notice eligibility, calculate the statutory sequence, particularise the cheque and dishonour, demand payment, and preserve service evidence. Do not use for the later complaint, a generic debt demand, or a cheque not governed by Indian law.