Legal-AI skills in General

1765 skills, across 35 practice areas.

Brief Section Drafter

MITGeneralLitigation

Draft a brief section in house style, consistent with the case theory — every fact cited, every case checked, every argument tied to the theory.

Budget and Fee Manager

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Matter budgeting and ongoing WIP/variance monitoring. Build phase-based fee estimates at matter setup, run bottom-up budgets by jurisdiction or workstream, calculate contingency, and structure AFA arrangements (fixed fee, capped fee, phased fixed fees). Ongoing monitoring: WIP tracking against budget, proportionality assessment (spend vs progress), variance commentary with root cause analysis, forecast-to-complete, realisation monitoring, write-off analysis. Trigger on: 'build a budget', 'fee estimate', 'what will this cost', 'WIP review', 'budget vs actual', 'how are we tracking against budget', 'we're over budget', 'realisation is poor', 'what's our ETC', 'budget for the German workstream', 'model the financial impact of this scope change', 'draft a fee adjustment', 'write-off analysis', 'how much contingency', 'AFA structure', 'fixed fee estimate', 'budget update', 'forecast to complete'.

Build Document Index

MITGeneralLitigation

Build a numbered, source-linked document index as a .docx file from supplied legal matter documents — one row per document or coherent file group with a stable source ID, recorded date, type, author, recipients, description taken from the document itself, page count, readability and duplicate or version links — suitable as a court-book or bundle index and as the source register for a chronology or privilege log. Use for litigation, investigations, regulatory responses, disclosure and brief preparation. Do not use to decide relevance, privilege, admissibility or weight, or to claim the set is complete beyond the supplied documents.

Build Evidence Chronology

MITGeneralLitigation

Build a source-linked evidence chronology as a .docx file from supplied legal matter documents using a native structured document-review table when available, preserving exact date wording, conflicting accounts, allegations, inferences and evidence gaps for human review. Use for litigation, investigations, regulatory responses, disputes or other matters requiring an auditable sequence of events. Do not use to decide credibility, evidentiary weight, admissibility, legal effect or merits, or to claim completeness beyond the supplied documents.

Build guide

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

帮助诊所指导老师撰写实践领域指南，配置面向学生技能的行为——接待问题、 教学姿态（assist / guide / teach）、审查门控、跨插件检查、本地规则。 当指导律师需要撰写或修订按实践领域的指南、调整诊所技能在其诊所类型 下的行为或将其教学理念设定为插件配置时使用。

Build guide

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Help a clinic supervisor author a practice-area guide that configures how student-facing skills behave — intake questions, pedagogy posture (assist / guide / teach), review gates, cross-plugin checks, and local rules. Use when a supervising attorney wants to build or revise a per-practice-area guide, tune how the clinic skills behave for their clinic type, or set their teaching philosophy as plugin configuration.

Building a Consent Preference Center

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Technical architecture guide for building a multi-purpose consent preference center. Covers per-purpose granularity, easy withdrawal under Article 7(3), version history, audit trails, and IAB Transparency and Consent Framework v2.2 integration. Includes database schema, API design, and UI component specifications.

Building Breach Response Team Playbook

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Builds a comprehensive breach response team playbook defining CSIRT and privacy team structure with named roles (incident commander, legal counsel, communications, IT forensics, DPO), escalation matrices, communication templates, pre-negotiated vendor contacts, and regulatory authority contacts organized by jurisdiction. Keywords: breach response playbook, CSIRT, incident response team, escalation matrix, communication templates, vendor contacts.

Building chronologies

Apache-2.0GeneralLitigation

Use when users say "build a chronology", "make a timeline", "what happened when", "chronology from disclosure", "source the key events", or need legal documents, correspondence, pleadings, witness evidence, or disclosure materials turned into a sourced event chronology.

Building Consent Record-Keeping

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Guide for building a consent record-keeping system to demonstrate valid consent per GDPR Article 7(1). Covers required fields including timestamp, version, purpose, mechanism, and identity. Implements audit-ready consent receipts per the Kantara Initiative Consent Receipt Specification and supervisory authority expectations.

Building Purpose Limitation Enforcement

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Technical enforcement of GDPR Article 5(1)(b) purpose limitation principle. Covers purpose-tagged data stores, access control per purpose, Article 6(4) compatibility assessment factors, and system design for preventing purpose creep. Includes purpose binding architecture and compatibility test implementation.

Build Privilege Log

MITGeneralLitigation

Prepare a draft privilege log as a .docx file from supplied legal matter documents — one row per document or family with the source ID, date, author and recipient roles, the basis the practitioner has instructed or the document's own face suggests (legal advice, litigation, without prejudice, confidential), the facts that support or undercut the claim, third-party circulation and possible waiver flags — with every claim left as a practitioner decision. Use for disclosure and discovery, subpoena and notice-to-produce responses, regulatory productions and privilege reviews. Do not use to decide that privilege exists or is lost, to assert a claim to a court or regulator, or for non-Australian privilege rules unless the practitioner supplies them.

Bulk Document Extraction & Review

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.

Business Agreement Generator

MITGeneralContracts

Generates customized business agreements for 10 common relationship types with plain English annotations. Use when formalizing a business relationship, creating a partnership agreement, or drafting a service contract from scratch. Trigger with "/agreement-generator" or "create a freelancer agreement".

Business Contract Review

MITGeneralContracts

Review business contracts for risk identification including liability clauses, IP ownership, termination terms, and payment conditions. Use this skill when the user needs a practical contract risk assessment for vendor agreements, partnership contracts, or service agreements — even if they say 'review this contract', 'what should I watch out for', 'is this agreement fair', or 'negotiate better terms'.

Business, Marketing, Sales and Law: Commercial Law — Contracts, IP, Employment, Privacy, and Disputes

MITGeneralCommercial

Use when orienting on a commercial legal question before taking it to counsel: the scope note on what this material is and is not, how legal risk actually materializes, contracts including the clauses that matter and the ones that are negotiated theatre, intellectual property across copyright, trademark, patents and trade secrets, employment and contractor classification, privacy and data obligations, consumer protection and marketing law, and disputes and their realistic costs. Orientation, not legal advice.

BYOD Privacy Policy

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

Implements BYOD privacy compliance frameworks for personal device use in the workplace. Covers personal vs corporate data separation, MDM capabilities and limitations, employee consent requirements, data wiping boundaries, and monitoring restrictions on personal devices. Keywords: BYOD, mobile device management, MDM, personal device, data separation, containerisation, remote wipe, employee privacy.

California Consumer Rights Workflow

Apache-2.0GeneralData protection

California consumer privacy rights workflow implementation under CCPA/CPRA. Covers right to know, delete, opt-out of sale/sharing, correct, and limit sensitive PI processing. Includes 45-day response timelines, identity verification procedures, and authorized agent handling.

Canned Responses Skill

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.

canonical-markdown-authoring

Apache-2.0GeneralContracts

Convert plain markdown contract drafts into OpenAgreements' canonical template.md authoring format — YAML frontmatter, Kind|Label|Value|Show When cover-term tables, oa:clause directives, [[Defined Term]] paragraphs, and oa:signer directives that compile to validated JSON specs and DOCX artifacts. Use when the user says "convert this to canonical markdown," "author a new OpenAgreements template," "migrate template to template.md," or "write a canonical-form contract."

Cap Table Analyst

MITGeneralCorporate

Works through dilution and ownership on a cap table using only the share counts, valuations, and round terms actually supplied — showing the arithmetic for every calculation and flagging option-pool timing, conversion order, or preference terms that were not specified rather than assuming a standard treatment. Use this whenever a user needs a cap table calculation worked through — including phrasings like "what does this round do to our ownership", "model the dilution from this SAFE conversion", "work out the post-money cap table", "how much does the option pool top-up dilute existing holders", or "run the liquidation waterfall on these preference terms". A quantification tool, not a fairness assessment — it does not judge whether the round terms are good; pair it with investment-and-shareholder-agreement-reviewer for that. Fires for any priced round, conversion, or waterfall calculation on a startup cap table.

Cap Table Sanity Check

MITGeneralCorporate

Use when a lawyer, investor, or founder needs a systematic mathematical and structural review of a capitalization table — verifying share totals, pre/post-money math, fully-diluted calculations, SAFE and convertible-note conversion, option pool mechanics, preference stack ordering, anti-dilution calculations, and ESOP vesting. Covers standard venture-capital structures (YC SAFEs, standard convertible notes, Series seed/A/B terms) with cross-MENA awareness for UAE ADGM/DIFC structures and KSA arrangements.

/carta

Apache-2.0GeneralGeneral practice

Redacta correspondencia rutinaria de la clínica jurídica: citaciones, solicitudes de documentos, actualizaciones de estado del asunto. Toda carta requiere revisión y aprobación del supervisor antes del envío. Usar cuando el usuario dice "carta al cliente", "citación", "pide documentos", "actualización", o necesita comunicarse con el cliente por escrito.

Carve-Out Transaction Memo

MITGeneralCorporate

Use when a lawyer or corporate advisor needs to draft a strategy memo for a parent company planning to carve out and divest a business unit. Covers legal entity restructuring, separation of shared services, IP and contract assignments, employee transfers, tax structuring, and regulatory approvals. Relevant across MENA (UAE, KSA, LB, EG), DIFC/ADGM, EU, and UK jurisdictions where carve-out complexity varies significantly between civil-law and common-law frameworks.