Terms of Use & Privacy Policy Review

Revisão de Termos de Uso e Política de Privacidade de plataforma digital sob Marco Civil da Internet (Lei 12.965/2014) e LGPD (Lei 13.709/2018): guarda de logs, responsabilidade de provedor, consentimento, cookies.

Terms of Use & Privacy Policy Review

Matter context

Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /digital-ecommerce-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/digital-ecommerce-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/.


Purpose

Termos de Uso de plataforma digital (loja online, SaaS, marketplace) e sua Política de Privacidade devem estar alinhados com duas leis: o Marco Civil da Internet (Lei 12.965/2014) e a LGPD (Lei 13.709/2018). [verified: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm; https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709compilado.htm]

Esta skill revisa ambos os documentos contra esse framework. Identifica gaps, conflitos, e riscos regulatórios.

Jurisdiction assumption

Premissa de jurisdição (Brasil):

No silent supplement. If a research query to the configured legal research tool (JusBrasil, Escavador) returns few or no results for a Marco Civil or LGPD requirement, report what was found and stop. Do NOT fill the gap from web search or model knowledge without asking.

Load the playbook

Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/digital-ecommerce-legal/CLAUDE.md first. Any specific positions the team has on what constitutes acceptable Terms (e.g., limitation of liability approach, arbitration yes/no, user dispute handling) apply to this review.

The review

Part 1: Marco Civil Compliance

  • Art. 19 — Safe harbor for user-generated content. Does the Terms say the platform is NOT liable for content posted by users unless the platform knew in advance and didn't remove it?
  • Art. 20 — Notice to the responsible user. Does Terms explain communication to the user responsible for content when contact information is available?
  • Art. 13 / Art. 15 — Logs and data retention. Does Terms say how long the platform keeps connection records and application access records? (Art. 13 = connection records for 1 year; Art. 15 = application access records for 6 months [verified: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm])
  • Art. 7º, I — User privacy. Does the Terms respect user privacy? Does it disclose what monitoring happens?

Part 2: LGPD Compliance

  • Art. 5º, VI/VII — Controller and operator. Who is the controller? Who is the operator? Is this clear?
  • Art. 7º — Lawful basis for each purpose. For each data collection, is there a lawful basis (consent, contract, legal obligation, legitimate interest)?
  • Art. 8º — Consent. If consent is the basis: is it informed? Separate from other contract terms? Can the user withdraw it?
  • Art. 9º — Transparency. Does Terms disclose what data is collected, who it's shared with, and for how long?
  • Art. 18 — Data subject rights. Does Terms acknowledge user's right to access, correct, delete, port, and object to data processing?
  • Art. 33 — International transfers. If data goes to other countries, is that disclosed? Are there proper legal mechanisms?

Part 3: Marco Civil + LGPD alignment

  • Does the Terms conflict with the Privacy Policy? (E.g., Terms says "we never share data" but Privacy Policy says "we share with partners.") 🔴 Blocking conflict.
  • Does the Terms set Rules that violate LGPD? (E.g., "we reserve the right to delete your account without notice" — may violate Art. 18.) Flag for attorney judgment. [review]
  • Is there a Data Processing Addendum (DPA)? (If users are businesses and platform processes data on their behalf, a DPA is needed under Art. 5º, VII.) If missing, flag.

Output

Format as a checklist summary + detailed findings. Highlight blocking issues (🔴), warnings (🟡), and clear items (✅).

What this skill does not do

  • It doesn't review marketing claims for truthfulness.
  • It doesn't audit code or data security.
  • It doesn't negotiate with third-party vendors on your behalf.

Last updated: October 13, 2026

Files (3)

Jurisdiction
🇧🇷 Brazil
Browse legal databases
Practice area
Data protection
License
Apache-2.0
Author
Bossmann007
Source
br/data-protection/skills/terms-of-use-privacy-review-bossmann007

Test Terms of Use & Privacy Policy Review

Ask a legal question — get an answer generated live from this skill’s instructions.

Sign in to test this skill.