CC-BY-4.0Cross-jurisdictionCriminal
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP) — Colombia's Special Jurisdiction for Peace — research, drafting, and analysis. Use whenever the conversation involves the JEP, the SIVJRNR / Sistema Integral para la Paz, the 2016 Final Peace Agreement with the FARC-EP, Acto Legislativo 01 de 2017, Ley Estatutaria 1957 de 2019, the 11 macrocasos (Caso 01 secuestro, Caso 03 falsos positivos, Caso 07 reclutamiento de menores, Caso 11 violencia sexual...), the Salas and the Tribunal Especial para la Paz, sanciones propias and TOAR, the régimen de condicionalidad, or the first restorative sentences of September 2025. Enforces a verification-first discipline: every resolución, sentencia, auto, or providencia citation must be verified against jep.gov.co before appearing in any output. Foundational texts (Acuerdo Final 2016, Acto Legislativo 01/2017, Ley 1957/2019, Reglamento General) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Trigger on JEP, Sistema Integral, sanciones propias, falsos positivos, or Casos 01-11.
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a user needs to compare how a specific legal issue is handled across multiple jurisdictions — to choose where to incorporate, where to arbitrate, which governing law to select, or to understand cross-border deal risk. Produces a structured comparison table with per-jurisdiction columns covering statute, rule, enforceability, duration limits, and risk; concludes with a recommendation. Covers MENA (LB, KSA, UAE onshore, DIFC, ADGM, EG) and secondary jurisdictions (UK, US-DE, FR, EU). Each cell must cite a real source.
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when Louis determines that a user's legal matter exceeds AI-only assistance and requires human professional intervention — a lawyer, specialist advisor, emergency service, or regulated professional. Covers the full set of handoff triggers (criminal risk, emergency, high penalty exposure, multi-jurisdictional litigation, user distress, explicit request, low confidence), the handoff process (acknowledge, identify domain, provide resource, schedule), and the constraint that Louis must never pretend to be a human, lawyer, or therapist. P0 safety-critical behavior.
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a law student needs a comprehensive course outline for exam preparation, bar revision, or self-study. Produces a structured topic hierarchy with black-letter rules, leading cases (1–3 per topic), common exam patterns, issue interactions, and memorization aids (mnemonics, comparison charts). Calibrated to specific law-school courses (Contracts, Torts, Civ Pro, Con Law, Crim Law, Evidence, Property, Corporate, and more) and to the applicable jurisdiction. Particularly strong for MENA civil-law courses (Lebanon, UAE, KSA, Egypt) and common-law courses (DIFC, UK, US).
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a student or bar candidate needs specific guidance on pacing, time allocation, and exam strategy for timed legal examinations — MBE, MEE, MPT, CRFPA note de synthèse, KSA bar, UAE bar, SQE1/SQE2, or Lebanese concours. Provides per-exam pacing rules, skip-and-return strategy, last-minute sweep checklist, anxiety management cues, and builds a personal pacing log over practice sessions. Covers all exam jurisdictions.
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a user wants to generate spaced-repetition flashcards from a statute, legal code, or regulation for bar exam or legal education purposes. Produces four card formats — term/definition, article/content, fact-pattern/rule, and comparison — plus a spaced-repetition schedule. Supports export to Anki, CSV, and in-app review. Covers all jurisdictions; most heavily used for MENA statutes (UAE Labor Law, KSA Companies Law, KSA PDPL, Lebanese COC).
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a law student or practitioner needs a structured case brief for any court decision. Produces a standard law-school brief covering procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, rule, reasoning, concurrences/dissents, and subsequent treatment. Adapts depth to the reader's level (1L, 2L/3L, bar prep, or practitioner). Multi-jurisdictional; particularly useful for common-law cases from DIFC, ADGM, UK, and US courts, and civil-law decisions from Lebanese, UAE, KSA, Egyptian, or French courts.
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a student submits a written legal essay, exam answer, or practice response for automated grading. Evaluates issue spotting, rule accuracy, application depth, conclusion quality, IRAC organization, and writing clarity on a bar-exam-style 0–100 scale with per-dimension 0–10 subscores and concrete, line-cited feedback. Adapts standard to student level (1L through bar candidate). Jurisdiction-aware, including MENA-specific rules and statute citations (UAE, KSA, Lebanon, Egypt, DIFC, ADGM).
MITCross-jurisdictionGeneral practice
Use when a student or junior lawyer is preparing for moot court, appellate oral argument, or any structured advocacy performance. This skill simulates the judicial bench (hot, cold, or hostile), coaches the opening roadmap, critiques argument structure and citation accuracy in real time, tracks time, and prepares rebuttal. Jurisdiction-agnostic; adapts to common-law (DIFC, ADGM, UK, US) and civil-law (Lebanon, UAE onshore, KSA, Egypt) court styles.